Walz's only standout moment was "damning non-answer"

JD Vance on the other hand

-conceeded that the current abortion laws killed women and "ruined lives", and then recomitted to the state by state policy

-repeatedly taked about his mother's addiction totally unprompted

-explained to America that Ohio "gets pretty cold in winter" in his CLOSING statement

-repeatedly referred to the moderators by their first name's in a way reminiscent of an 16 year old who just read "How to Win Friends and Influence People"

-had no actual accomplishements to tout

-repeatedly dodged questions, even when the questions were expllicitily redirected to him by Walz or the moderators

JD Vance did not have a good debate. To paraphrase Tolkien, he looked fairer, but felt fouler.