Watched former toxicologist Dr. Chris Martensen's (Peak Prosperity) analysis of the Swedish study of vax efficacy, also reported here at "bad cattitude". Mind blowing. The study reveals the need for endless boosters @ 90-120 days. He discusses what additional data collected for the future might reveal (and you can right guess). At the same time, my local news is running pieces showcasing young kids excited to get their first child-vax (5-11), telling their cute stories about how they'd put the jab on their Christmas wish list, with their local Dr. moms' at our local hospitals clapping for how wonderful it is to see this wish fulfilled. My next thought in seeing this, primed with Dr. M's analysis of the Swede study was...yeah, because this is part of how you eliminate the controls that made the Swede data so illuminating. You had still, unvaxxed people to pair up against! The mandate attempts are the other prong in that pincer move. The local news story ended with two lines of excitement over the expectation that babies will soon be eligible for their own vax doses. I was so gobsmacked that I watched the latenight repeat of the news from another channel...same story, same people, same language. KVRR after the Thursday Night Football game, and KVLY on its 1AM rebroadcast of the 10P news.

Get rid of the controls, and you cannot know what effect "natural" immunity might have had, nor can you know to what degree otherwise natural immunity was destroyed. This was a point Dr. M lingered on a bit in his video...the efficacy figures' error bars go *negative*, implying that there's the change that at some point, post-vax, not only does your susceptibility to infection return to the unvaxxed baseline, but you become *MORE* vulnerable (perhaps unless you get a booster...but this is as yet almost completely unknown).