US trade officials concerned about China’s ‘economic coercion’ ahead of Apec trade meeting

Christopher Wilson, assistant US Trade Representative, says US has ‘ongoing concerns about the misuse and manipulation of intellectual property’
US trade officials see role for organisations that both involve China in discussions and those that exclude it in attempts to solve supply chain issues

US-China relations

Robert Delaney

Published: 12:04pm, 5 May 2023

Why you can trust SCMP

A US trade official cited China’s “economic coercion” among issues that his delegation would like to discuss with counterparts from Beijing in a coming round of Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (Apec) talks in Detroit this month.

The Apec trade ministers’ meeting, set for May 25 and 26, will cover “ongoing efforts to recover from a variety of external disruptions to global and regional trade, including effects of the pandemic and of the war in Ukraine”, Christopher Wilson, assistant US Trade Representative for Japan, Korea and Apec, told reporters in Washington on Thursday.

Asked whether the US delegation at the Apec ministerial meeting, led by US Trade Representative Katherine Tai, would hold bilateral talks with the Chinese delegation, Wilson said Tai’s team would “be looking for opportunities to find common ground where we can in our discussions with China”.

14:45

An unwinnable conflict? The US-China trade war, 5 years on

“Our broad concerns are well known in terms of a very heavy role of the Chinese state and Chinese state resources in the direction of China’s economy in ways that we believe do have distortionary effects for the United States and other trading partners,” Wilson said.

“We have ongoing concerns about the misuse and manipulation of intellectual property in ways that are harmful to US economic interests, and … what we refer to as economic coercion, so China’s activities [using] its economic power to press trading partners for certain outcomes.

“It’s important for us to talk to China about those concerns,” Wilson said. “It’s important for us to talk to other trading partners who share those concerns.”

No formal agenda has been finalised for the meeting.

Wilson’s comments underscore recent overtures by other US officials looking to engage with Beijing in the many areas of friction that have emerged since US President Joe Biden met his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping in Indonesia last year.

US-Taiwan trade negotiations should be updated ‘soon’, Biden official says

Efforts to continue the high-level bilateral dialogue were derailed by acrimony caused by the emergence of a suspected Chinese spy balloon over US territory that the Pentagon shot down in February and Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen’s visit with US House Speaker Kevin McCarthy last month.

More recently, however, Biden officials have said they are open to dialogue with Beijing.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, for example, said two weeks ago that the two sides “need to find a way to live together and share in global prosperity”. And Washington’s top envoy to Beijing, Nicholas Burns, struck a similar note this week when he said: “We need better channels between the two governments and deeper channels and we are ready to talk.”

In addition to allegations of economic coercion and deepening layers of restrictions that the Biden administration has placed on exports of advanced semiconductor chips and other hi-tech products, the two sides have made little progress towards ending a bilateral tariff war that started nearly five years ago.

02:54

French and EU leaders visit China to discuss trade and the Russia-Ukraine war

And Washington has made it a priority to help companies move their supply chains out of China, an objective that Wilson and Matthew Murray, State Department senior official for Apec, were asked about in Thursday’s briefing.

“I do think there are ways in which we can work in Apec on supply chain resiliency in a manner that it does include China at the table,” Murray said. “And certainly there may be other mechanisms where the conversation on supply chains may be slightly different.”

As Chinese firms move supply chains out of China, India and Southeast Asia benefit

Murray explained that supply chain issues within the Apec framework would seek to promote best practices broadly and tackle problems similar to when shipping “ground to a halt” during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021.

As for efforts to reduce supply chain dependence on China, he said, these would be handled through forums that did not involve Beijing, including the Biden administration’s Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, which comprises 14 Pacific Rim countries but excludes China.

Other forums referenced for this effort include the US-EU Trade and Technology Council and an agreement on supply chain resilience that US Secretary of State Blinken signed with Thailand last year.