574 Comments
⭠ Return to thread
author

Can you explain? I was thinking something along the lines of "the obvious intent of the writers and of the voters was to keep the 24 week ban, so judges will interpret the text in that context". How would you describe that, and how would you describe originalism?

By the way, trivial warning (1% of ban) for doing the thing where you accuse someone of being wrong but give no explanation.

Expand full comment