Great work Bettina, you have done more for real equality than anyone else in my 65 years. Exposing the outrageous over reach by the self righteous universities is a public service. The victim culture of Hate all White Males is a blight on our society.
On what may seem like an unrelated matter, the impending extradition of Assange, I would like to warn my fellow Aussies what is in the balance.
Forget journalism. Assange was, primarily, a whistleblower who reported the major crime of state murder to we citizens of the world.
Readers may believe we still have some rights, this conclusion based on the evidence of our previous entries here and elsewhere. We have been permitted this freedom because the globalists require more certainty as to their own immunity from prosecution and justice.
The moment Assange is extradited, he is the walking dead. So too are we.
Once Assange is gone, the globalists will commence moving on all citizens who are unvaccinated, or who have protested in any way.
We need to do what we can to have Assange returned to Australia, and appealing to Albanese is not one avenue where success can even be hoped for. The protest will need to be of considerable substance.
When I visited my sister who works at a European University she pointed out where a witch was hanged. And I was astonished when I visited Oxford University that they also had killed a witch. I was at the time working for human rights against compulsory psychiatric treatments including Lobotomies, which are still done at a leading hospital under the guidance of a major University psych dept. We established legal rights in 1986 although the Government stopped short of banning this treatment. Times haven't changed that much, and Universities are not so clever as they think. They are at times not much different to the people who in the past burnt innocent women at the stake.
Have you heard of Maurice Blackburn Lawyers who boldly advertise "WE FIGHT FOR FAIR"- Look at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaYCnykSujY - as the Universities are pouring out dozens of young women lawyers then perhaps 'maurice b' MAY BE thinking "we fight for (the un-)fair sex". - Still it is worth testing the "WE FIGHT FOR FAIR" advertising.
These Kanga Courts are the executive arm of "Believe all Women". My sister was the manager of a women's refuge. She didn't and doesn't believe all of them and, professionally, never judged further than prima facia.
Anyone should be held accountable for denying one’s natural process it is fundamental to our human rights. Those within University would run like cowards the minute they have to pay up out of their own money for legal costs. If anyone overlooks a persons rights and goes on a witch-hunt then they should be sued for every cent they have. Take their money from them and this nonsense would stop.
Despite the self-perceived virtue and righteousness of Critical Social Theory idealists, they fail to grasp the most fundamental standards of accountability when meting out justice, both legal and moral. The hypocrisy would be comical if it wasn't so destructive.
While ruthlessly scapegoating young men within the confines of the university bubble has long been a fantasy for many within the 'rainbows and unicorns' world of activist academics and students, like all fantasies, the actualisation rarely conforms with reality, let alone the expectations and values of mainstream society.
Perhaps the day is finally approaching when universities will stop submitting innocent young men to the injustice of a contrived Kangaroo Court, forfeiture of their career, and the immolation of their integrity and good character.
An inversion in which party is required to face legal scrutiny is the only thing that will change the behaviour of woke universities. Academic social justice warriors have invested decades inculcating their ideas into the culture of their respective universities, and will not give up the philosophical battle willingly.
What is astonishing is the realisation that Universities are employing senior staff thick enough to think that their suppression of the process of justice was in the interests of a just society, and that they could ever get away with such stupid, callous and vindictive behaviour.
When these cases eventually come to a reconstituted court, and judicial justice is done, what will follow will be establishment of a register that identifies the perpetrators and ensures their behaviour follows them for life. Of cource, this is litigious terrain in itself but I don't care because litigators will then face pariah status themselves. The technique was developed in Utah and works like a charm.
I strongly suggest that zealots and fanatics refrain from engaging in abberations from natural justice.
I hope the universities get taken to the cleaners for their abuse of procedural fairness.
Thank the gods there are people like you, willing to slog through the mud and stand up for basic legal protections and due process.
Great work Bettina, you have done more for real equality than anyone else in my 65 years. Exposing the outrageous over reach by the self righteous universities is a public service. The victim culture of Hate all White Males is a blight on our society.
On what may seem like an unrelated matter, the impending extradition of Assange, I would like to warn my fellow Aussies what is in the balance.
Forget journalism. Assange was, primarily, a whistleblower who reported the major crime of state murder to we citizens of the world.
Readers may believe we still have some rights, this conclusion based on the evidence of our previous entries here and elsewhere. We have been permitted this freedom because the globalists require more certainty as to their own immunity from prosecution and justice.
The moment Assange is extradited, he is the walking dead. So too are we.
Once Assange is gone, the globalists will commence moving on all citizens who are unvaccinated, or who have protested in any way.
We need to do what we can to have Assange returned to Australia, and appealing to Albanese is not one avenue where success can even be hoped for. The protest will need to be of considerable substance.
One very scary factor is that Universities want to be able to influence government policy and direction. They consider themselves to be experts.
I believe they want priority not equality.
When I visited my sister who works at a European University she pointed out where a witch was hanged. And I was astonished when I visited Oxford University that they also had killed a witch. I was at the time working for human rights against compulsory psychiatric treatments including Lobotomies, which are still done at a leading hospital under the guidance of a major University psych dept. We established legal rights in 1986 although the Government stopped short of banning this treatment. Times haven't changed that much, and Universities are not so clever as they think. They are at times not much different to the people who in the past burnt innocent women at the stake.
Have you heard of Maurice Blackburn Lawyers who boldly advertise "WE FIGHT FOR FAIR"- Look at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaYCnykSujY - as the Universities are pouring out dozens of young women lawyers then perhaps 'maurice b' MAY BE thinking "we fight for (the un-)fair sex". - Still it is worth testing the "WE FIGHT FOR FAIR" advertising.
These Kanga Courts are the executive arm of "Believe all Women". My sister was the manager of a women's refuge. She didn't and doesn't believe all of them and, professionally, never judged further than prima facia.
Tina, thank you once again.
Anyone should be held accountable for denying one’s natural process it is fundamental to our human rights. Those within University would run like cowards the minute they have to pay up out of their own money for legal costs. If anyone overlooks a persons rights and goes on a witch-hunt then they should be sued for every cent they have. Take their money from them and this nonsense would stop.
Thanks again Bettina for the great information.
Good to see cracks appearing in the dam wall, no doubt aided by your crystal clear analytical thinking and logic. When do you rest?
Despite the self-perceived virtue and righteousness of Critical Social Theory idealists, they fail to grasp the most fundamental standards of accountability when meting out justice, both legal and moral. The hypocrisy would be comical if it wasn't so destructive.
While ruthlessly scapegoating young men within the confines of the university bubble has long been a fantasy for many within the 'rainbows and unicorns' world of activist academics and students, like all fantasies, the actualisation rarely conforms with reality, let alone the expectations and values of mainstream society.
Perhaps the day is finally approaching when universities will stop submitting innocent young men to the injustice of a contrived Kangaroo Court, forfeiture of their career, and the immolation of their integrity and good character.
An inversion in which party is required to face legal scrutiny is the only thing that will change the behaviour of woke universities. Academic social justice warriors have invested decades inculcating their ideas into the culture of their respective universities, and will not give up the philosophical battle willingly.
What is astonishing is the realisation that Universities are employing senior staff thick enough to think that their suppression of the process of justice was in the interests of a just society, and that they could ever get away with such stupid, callous and vindictive behaviour.
When men predominated in universities they were places of learning, exploration, research and creativity.
This is very encouraging. We have to keep fighting this. Thanks
When these cases eventually come to a reconstituted court, and judicial justice is done, what will follow will be establishment of a register that identifies the perpetrators and ensures their behaviour follows them for life. Of cource, this is litigious terrain in itself but I don't care because litigators will then face pariah status themselves. The technique was developed in Utah and works like a charm.
I strongly suggest that zealots and fanatics refrain from engaging in abberations from natural justice.