New York Times (NYT): The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of Covid Data It Collects; The agency has withheld critical data on boosters, hospitalizations &, until recently, wastewater analyses.
New York Times (NYT): The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of Covid Data It Collects; The agency has withheld critical data on boosters, hospitalizations &, until recently, wastewater analyses.
All of a sudden - mainstream is having mutterings - of what all the heathens, hacks, and voodoo nutter anti-vaxxers have been saying since day FUCKING 1!!!!!!!!
I'm with Lucinda on this one.
This is like the hot babe in the back of the class ignoring you the whole way through high school, snickering with her friends about how you "don't play sports and how you read books and listen to classical music and you're weird".
Then, 20 years later, you bump into her on the street and she's a shadow of her former self, while you've reached your true potential.
The question is - do you forgive her when she says "sorry Barry, I shouldn't have been so mean to you back then".
And I say: "I can't say I remember you. I really must go. I have important things to do - like watching paint dry".
The Daily Telegraph last night published their lead article saying lockdowns appear cause more deaths than covid.
The very robust comments flowed in at a phenomenal rate from readers ( 1600 plus this morning) and were savage about lockdowns and the vax. It was very heartening.
( few seem to buy the argument it’s lockdown btw!)
Remarkably not one comment had been censored
We have sensed for over a week a fundamental change has taken place in this paper which is known to take Gates money . It had been absurdly censoring readers comments and it’s reporting very selected eg nothing on Dutch farmers.
Why this is occurring is interesting.
I suspect the adverse data has become overwhelming and they are now seeking to set a narrative that seeks to formally blame all ills on the lockdown…… along with, no doubt, climate change and stress …..
I was the senior officer in charge of the Covid incidence response team for the organization I work for last summer. ~49,000 employees. I compiled the individual based data and wrote the weekly presentations for senior leadership. The organization removed from internal public reporting the rolled-up data across the whole organization and took away the vaccination status data in Feb. I did a parsed analysis of the Jan data and found that 93% of those infected with Covid were fully vaccinated and that the organization was reporting 4x as many tracked infections on a daily basis than anytime during the whole pandemic. It was getting too hard to hide the continued failure of an organization that tried to pull the 'get vaxxed or you will be fired' (there are still, to this day, people who are placed on leave without pay because they won't 1) vaxx and 2) get tested every week) but the latest buzz is 'hey, the CDC says that you do not have to differentiate between vaxx status' and I am sure it will be 'the science say's thing again when the organization informs those who are teleworking or on leave without pay that they are welcomed with open arms back to the office.
Any trivial, short lived unpredictable 'protection' comes at the expense of unpredictable, serious or fatal "adverse events of special interest" ... all 1000 or more listed by Pfizer in its 9 page Appendix of, 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT
REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021
Don’t forget it was CDC policy to classify people unvaccinated less than 14 days of administration. Then applied the same policy after the second dose. They marked all CovId deaths with Covid. Also, they ignored Natural Immunity and Herd Immunity. FDA is just as bad denying early treatments like HCQ thanks to Azar overriding Trump.
I trust NOTHING the CDC Comes out with...and that includes any data they "allow" us peasants to see.
You know they were lying from the get go...pushing One jabbed into unvaxxed category....and using historical data to pretend right now is a pandemic of the unvaxxed.
They thinik we are stupid...and if we beleive ANYTHING they say or publish...we are.
Most Canadian provinces, Health Canada itself, Scotland, UK as a whole and several other countries and PH agencies, have all stopped collecting and reporting inconvenient data to the public. It's obvious (to me) why - the most compliant fare much worse in every way compared to the refusers. But these PH nodes didn't just independently decide to all stop reporting to the public at roughly the same time. That coincidence is unbelievable. This had to be ordered. Who gave the order? Where is the smoke from the likeliest gun?
They (CDC) do not want anyone to see the real data, it would blow them out of the water completely. They have done nothing but LIE and stalled showing any fact (honest facts!) to anyone. They are making too much money and do not want that jeopardized. I doubt that they even collected any proper data!
Great! The friends I can’t talk to “lately “read nyt
To us , the evidence is undeniable.
( don’t forget to rest!)
All of a sudden - mainstream is having mutterings - of what all the heathens, hacks, and voodoo nutter anti-vaxxers have been saying since day FUCKING 1!!!!!!!!
I'm with Lucinda on this one.
This is like the hot babe in the back of the class ignoring you the whole way through high school, snickering with her friends about how you "don't play sports and how you read books and listen to classical music and you're weird".
Then, 20 years later, you bump into her on the street and she's a shadow of her former self, while you've reached your true potential.
The question is - do you forgive her when she says "sorry Barry, I shouldn't have been so mean to you back then".
And I say: "I can't say I remember you. I really must go. I have important things to do - like watching paint dry".
And we all know exactly why they won’t release the data.....I don’t even have to say it, but I will.....
ITS BECAUSE THE SHITSHOTS DONT WORK, AND THEY ARE KILLING PEOPLE.
Quick update from the Uk
The Daily Telegraph last night published their lead article saying lockdowns appear cause more deaths than covid.
The very robust comments flowed in at a phenomenal rate from readers ( 1600 plus this morning) and were savage about lockdowns and the vax. It was very heartening.
( few seem to buy the argument it’s lockdown btw!)
Remarkably not one comment had been censored
We have sensed for over a week a fundamental change has taken place in this paper which is known to take Gates money . It had been absurdly censoring readers comments and it’s reporting very selected eg nothing on Dutch farmers.
Why this is occurring is interesting.
I suspect the adverse data has become overwhelming and they are now seeking to set a narrative that seeks to formally blame all ills on the lockdown…… along with, no doubt, climate change and stress …..
Still a very long way to go but it’s a start.
I was the senior officer in charge of the Covid incidence response team for the organization I work for last summer. ~49,000 employees. I compiled the individual based data and wrote the weekly presentations for senior leadership. The organization removed from internal public reporting the rolled-up data across the whole organization and took away the vaccination status data in Feb. I did a parsed analysis of the Jan data and found that 93% of those infected with Covid were fully vaccinated and that the organization was reporting 4x as many tracked infections on a daily basis than anytime during the whole pandemic. It was getting too hard to hide the continued failure of an organization that tried to pull the 'get vaxxed or you will be fired' (there are still, to this day, people who are placed on leave without pay because they won't 1) vaxx and 2) get tested every week) but the latest buzz is 'hey, the CDC says that you do not have to differentiate between vaxx status' and I am sure it will be 'the science say's thing again when the organization informs those who are teleworking or on leave without pay that they are welcomed with open arms back to the office.
Negative risk benefit.
Any trivial, short lived unpredictable 'protection' comes at the expense of unpredictable, serious or fatal "adverse events of special interest" ... all 1000 or more listed by Pfizer in its 9 page Appendix of, 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT
REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021
Don’t forget it was CDC policy to classify people unvaccinated less than 14 days of administration. Then applied the same policy after the second dose. They marked all CovId deaths with Covid. Also, they ignored Natural Immunity and Herd Immunity. FDA is just as bad denying early treatments like HCQ thanks to Azar overriding Trump.
I trust NOTHING the CDC Comes out with...and that includes any data they "allow" us peasants to see.
You know they were lying from the get go...pushing One jabbed into unvaxxed category....and using historical data to pretend right now is a pandemic of the unvaxxed.
They thinik we are stupid...and if we beleive ANYTHING they say or publish...we are.
I get the sense at last “ they” are getting worried as the irrefutable data emerges
When the wider public realise what’s happened, and they will in the end, I believe there may well be civil unrest
The nonsense is starting to unravel very quickly.
Must get rid of the root of the problem, the satanic cultist super elites, the ones we don't hear about who are giving orders behind the scenes.
And more as of tonight!
https://youtu.be/U6gmPrQQwuk
It really is changing at a rate of knots.
Most Canadian provinces, Health Canada itself, Scotland, UK as a whole and several other countries and PH agencies, have all stopped collecting and reporting inconvenient data to the public. It's obvious (to me) why - the most compliant fare much worse in every way compared to the refusers. But these PH nodes didn't just independently decide to all stop reporting to the public at roughly the same time. That coincidence is unbelievable. This had to be ordered. Who gave the order? Where is the smoke from the likeliest gun?
They (CDC) do not want anyone to see the real data, it would blow them out of the water completely. They have done nothing but LIE and stalled showing any fact (honest facts!) to anyone. They are making too much money and do not want that jeopardized. I doubt that they even collected any proper data!