BA.5 much more infectious than BA.2; Kislaya et al.: "SARS-CoV-2 BA.5 vaccine breakthrough risk & severity compared to BA.2: a case-case and cohort study using Electronic Health Records in Portugal"
BA.5 much more infectious than BA.2; Kislaya et al.: "SARS-CoV-2 BA.5 vaccine breakthrough risk & severity compared to BA.2: a case-case and cohort study using Electronic Health Records in Portugal"
SOURCE: SARS-CoV-2 BA.5 vaccine breakthrough risk and severity compared with BA.2: a case-case and cohort study using Electronic Health Records in Portugal “The odds of complete primary vaccination (aOR=1.07, 95% CI 0.93-1.23) or booster dose (aOR=0.96, 95% CI 0.84–1.09) among the BA.5 cases were similar to the BA.2 cases, suggesting no significant differences in vaccine effectiveness against infection for the BA.5 lineage compared to BA.2(Table2).
BA.5 much more infectious than BA.2; Kislaya et al.: "SARS-CoV-2 BA.5 vaccine breakthrough risk & severity compared to BA.2: a case-case and cohort study using Electronic Health Records in Portugal"
But what does this mean for the never-jabbed who have acquired natural immunity? Same risk of reinfection? Impossible to tell because so few Portuguese are not jabbed yet so many jabbed have gotten sick, and more than once. I think the jabs have wiped out Portuguese population's ability to cope with all future strains and the tiny percent that is never-jabbed are so poisoned with the exosomes from the jabbed that they too are probably toast. Because hardly-jabbed South Africa certainly doesn't seem to have this problem of same vulnerability to BA.5. They seem pretty immune to it. And the summary should have said, "no significant differences in vaccine INeffectiveness against BA.5 or BA.2."
I've feeling this isn't good for jabbed nor unjabbed since the jabbed infecting them w/dangerous graphene oxide and they've now nanoparticles in their blood. Nothing like having red blood cells destroyed.
Apolipoprotein E (APOE) plays a pivotal role in lipid including cholesterol metabolism. The APOE ε4 (APOE4) allele is a major genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s and cardiovascular diseases. Although APOE has recently been associated with increased susceptibility to infections of several viruses, whether and how APOE and its isoforms affect SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unclear.
BA.5 much more infectious than BA.2; Kislaya et al.: "SARS-CoV-2 BA.5 vaccine breakthrough risk & severity compared to BA.2: a case-case and cohort study using Electronic Health Records in Portugal"
But what does this mean for the never-jabbed who have acquired natural immunity? Same risk of reinfection? Impossible to tell because so few Portuguese are not jabbed yet so many jabbed have gotten sick, and more than once. I think the jabs have wiped out Portuguese population's ability to cope with all future strains and the tiny percent that is never-jabbed are so poisoned with the exosomes from the jabbed that they too are probably toast. Because hardly-jabbed South Africa certainly doesn't seem to have this problem of same vulnerability to BA.5. They seem pretty immune to it. And the summary should have said, "no significant differences in vaccine INeffectiveness against BA.5 or BA.2."
Thanks for sharing
I've feeling this isn't good for jabbed nor unjabbed since the jabbed infecting them w/dangerous graphene oxide and they've now nanoparticles in their blood. Nothing like having red blood cells destroyed.
Apolipoprotein E (APOE) plays a pivotal role in lipid including cholesterol metabolism. The APOE ε4 (APOE4) allele is a major genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s and cardiovascular diseases. Although APOE has recently been associated with increased susceptibility to infections of several viruses, whether and how APOE and its isoforms affect SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unclear.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-022-01118-4
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2203760119#bibliography