Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche and Dr. Paul Elias Alexander discuss the COVID vaccines, the monkeypox vaccine, innate immunity in children and why COVID vaccines must not be given to children.
palexander.substack.com
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche and Dr. Paul Elias Alexander discuss the COVID vaccines, the monkeypox vaccine, innate immunity in children and why COVID vaccines must not be given to children.
COVID, mRNA vaccines, and monkeypox vaccines, innate immunity and why children should not get the non-neutralizing antigen-specific (high-specificity) COVID vaccines that drives infection in vaccinee
Since you liked this post, why not share it to help spread the word?
Share this post
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche and Dr. Paul Elias Alexander discuss the COVID vaccines, the monkeypox vaccine, innate immunity in children and why COVID vaccines must not be given to children.
Substack Alexander COVID News evidence-based medicine is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
There's a dangerous thing in the shadows of the controversy nobody seems to be talking about.
This involves the spike-derived induced immunosuppression and the impact that will have on incubating and selecting for increased fungal resistance in situ, particularly in the human foot.
It appears from the storm clouds on the horizon that a hurricane of debilitating and disfiguring fungal illness and potential amputations are likely to be unleashed in the susceptible human population.
I recall that Scientific American once published 1.6 million Americans die from fungal infections each year. I don't know what the current numbers are. Whatever they are, spike-derived immunosuppression will see that number rise.
We obsess reasonably about spike-amplified resistance in bacterial infections. Perhaps the potential for exponential occurrence of resistant fungal infections unleashed by a population-wide spike-derived immune system injury syndrome is simply too terrifying to contemplate.
Even more terrifying is the de facto creation of an aggregate human cohort of millions of altered individuals engaged in involuntary and accelerated natural selection to actively incubate what may ultimately present as uniquely virulent and perhaps more lethal human fungal strains. This is a really troubling thought.
It's not paranoia. It's biology 101.
What if something like this was the object of the exercise all along? Use the viral to legitimate the bacterial fears to prolong distraction from the ultimate target of cryptically exploiting the spike-afflicted population to unleash an exponentially dangerous vulnerability that selected for unprecedented increases in fungal morbidity and resulting mortality?
What a diabolical bioweapon that would be.
The spike-afflicted have not only been injured by degraded immune function, they have had their lives and personhood enslaved in an involuntary and uncompensated state of incubating and selecting-for more resistant and more virulent pathogens.
What a diabolical piracy of human trafficking that would be.
Thank you Dr. Alexander and Dr. Bossche for everything you do.
Reposting this from your post immediately prior:
There's a dangerous thing in the shadows of the controversy nobody seems to be talking about.
This involves the spike-derived induced immunosuppression and the impact that will have on incubating and selecting for increased fungal resistance in situ, particularly in the human foot.
It appears from the storm clouds on the horizon that a hurricane of debilitating and disfiguring fungal illness and potential amputations are likely to be unleashed in the susceptible human population.
I recall that Scientific American once published 1.6 million Americans die from fungal infections each year. I don't know what the current numbers are. Whatever they are, spike-derived immunosuppression will see that number rise.
We obsess reasonably about spike-amplified resistance in bacterial infections. Perhaps the potential for exponential occurrence of resistant fungal infections unleashed by a population-wide spike-derived immune system injury syndrome is simply too terrifying to contemplate.
Even more terrifying is the de facto creation of an aggregate human cohort of millions of altered individuals engaged in involuntary and accelerated natural selection to actively incubate what may ultimately present as uniquely virulent and perhaps more lethal human fungal strains. This is a really troubling thought.
It's not paranoia. It's biology 101.
What if something like this was the object of the exercise all along? Use the viral to legitimate the bacterial fears to prolong distraction from the ultimate target of cryptically exploiting the spike-afflicted population to unleash an exponentially dangerous vulnerability that selected for unprecedented increases in fungal morbidity and resulting mortality?
What a diabolical bioweapon that would be.
The spike-afflicted have not only been injured by degraded immune function, they have had their lives and personhood enslaved in an involuntary and uncompensated state of incubating and selecting-for more resistant and more virulent pathogens.
What a diabolical piracy of human trafficking that would be.