Business coaching for one person business owners | 10 years supporting entrepreneurial talent | Founder of The Ask®
An age old debate -- is it better to be a Generalist v Specialist? in your career I scoured the web, read the books, watched the TED talks and have put some of the main takeaways together in The Ask® latest newsletter post out today.. it's a long one I warn you! As you can imagine there is a lot of nuance to consider and some more helpful frameworks to apply. Have a read and subscribe for more entrepreneurial career guidance if it so pleases you. Link in first comment!
In work as in life we need a broad range of experiences to widen our knowledge, perform to our best and feel most fulfilled. We are being led down a rabbit hole of narrow expertise, forced to specialise and put in specialist roles, which doesn't make use of our full talents. We need to develop a broad range of skills and earn wide range of experiences to make the most of ourselves and our careers, to the benefit of all. For example, tackling critical subjects, like climate change, relying just on specialists, has caused disasters, historically. This has borne out in many cases. The Enron debacle. Enron had the best experts with deep expertise, from Ivy League colleges. But they were more reliant on depth of expertise than breadth of experience. Or take the case of Long Term Capital Management which almost caused worldwide financial collapse in the 90's. It had two Nobel Prize winning Economists on board, despite which it collapsed. As much as we need depth of expertise, we equally if not more need breadth of experience in our teams. Wickedly, I could argue that the percentage of Ivy League alumni that have caused worldwide disasters outrank those from Tier 2 & 3 and beyond Universities. If only they had diversity on teams.
Tricia Alach and Elizabeth Sullivan you might enjoy this about Generalists ans Specialists. Not sure the binary is helpful, but good to see generalists getting recognised.
Thanks for your perspective Ellen. I've recently been following other creators talk about making yourself your niche or customer archetype without a plan as to how you will monetize your audience. I agree that it's important to have a roadmap. I also agree that creating content can help someone determine what product/service they could eventual offer their audience. I guess it's all a matter of where you stand on the arc you mentioned. Cheers!
Personally I really enjoyed this book: https://davidepstein.com/the-range/ about generalists.
Just got this in my inbox 📨 and thought YES! This is exactly what I need to read, I feel a lot of pressure (purely my own pressure) regarding this so the alternative frameworks will really help. Thank you! 👏
Great work - thank you!
Ah yes, the age old debate…isn’t it time for fresh thinking on this? I see a third option emerging in the workforce where people actually have a hybrid professional identity and that Venn diagram/ mashup of identities is a powerful concept to unlock. Can’t wait to share more soon, Ellen Donnelly 😉
Loved the shoutout here, Milly!
Business coaching for one person business owners | 10 years supporting entrepreneurial talent | Founder of The Ask®
1yhttps://theask.substack.com/p/is-it-better-to-be-a-generalist-or?sd=pf