Do China and Russia Undermine US Sanctions? Evidence from DiD and Event Study Estimation

33 Pages Posted: 2 Dec 2022

See all articles by Jerg Gutmann

Jerg Gutmann

University of Hamburg - Institute of Law and Economics; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)

Matthias Neuenkirch

University of Trier - Faculty of Economics; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)

Florian Neumeier

CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute) - Ifo Institute

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: 2022

Abstract

A frequently employed argument against imposing international sanctions is that rival superpowers are likely to bust sanctions to simultaneously shield the target, harm the sender, and make a profit. We evaluate the legitimacy of this concern by studying the effect of US sanctions on trade flows between sanctioned and third countries during the period 1995–2019 using panel difference-in-differences estimations and an event study design. Motivated by the claim that China and Russia purposefully undermine US sanction efforts, we test whether target countries’ trade with China and Russia increases under US trade sanctions. We find no evidence for systematic sanction busting. Russia does not change its trade patterns with sanctioned countries. Trade of targets of US sanctions with China declines even more than trade with the US. These general patterns are reconfirmed for trade in different groups of commodities. In addition, we find some evidence that a reduction in industrial value added and a devaluation of the domestic currency of the target country are transmission channels through which US sanctions hamper trade with third countries.

Keywords: geopolitics, international political economy, international sanctions, trade substitution

undefined

JEL Classification: F130, F140, F500, F510, F520, F530, K330

Suggested Citation

Gutmann, Jerg and Neuenkirch, Matthias and Neumeier, Florian, Do China and Russia Undermine US Sanctions? Evidence from DiD and Event Study Estimation (2022). CESifo Working Paper No. 10100, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4291734 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4291734

Jerg Gutmann (Contact Author)

University of Hamburg - Institute of Law and Economics ( email )

Johnsallee 35
Hamburg, 20148
Germany

CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute) ( email )

Poschinger Str. 5
Munich, DE-81679
Germany

Matthias Neuenkirch

University of Trier - Faculty of Economics ( email )

Universitätsring 15
Trier, 54296
Germany
+49 - (0)651 - 201 - 2629 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.uni-trier.de/index.php?id=50130

CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute) ( email )

Poschinger Str. 5
Munich, DE-81679
Germany

Florian Neumeier

CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute) - Ifo Institute ( email )

Poschinger Str. 5
Munich, 01069
Germany

0 References

    0 Citations

      Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

      Paper statistics

      Downloads
      220
      Abstract Views
      986
      Rank
      251,070
      PlumX Metrics
      Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
      • Usage
        • Abstract Views: 973
        • Downloads: 219
      • Captures
        • Readers: 4
      see details