Hello.
With what just happened, I think that it would be useful to have the actual governance contract as one of the signer on the multisig fund.
So we could have a 4/6 multisig instead of a 4/5, if ever something happens to 2 signers, we could still be able to manage the community fund.
Example today:
2 of the 5 signers are unavailable for example on our 4/5 multisig.
-> Only 3 signers left, so the multisig would be useless, as we need 4 signatures.
Example if we add actual governance as a signer (so switching to a 4/6 multisig)
2 of the 6 signers are unavailable for example
-> 4 signers left, multisig is OK as we need 4 signatures.
As it is very important, we need to move on fast on this subject. I will make a snapshot vote today so you guys can vote on it during 3 days.