Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
People protesting gerrymandering in Wisconsin
Wisconsin’s supreme court is expected to rule on important gerrymandering, voting rights and abortion cases. Photograph: Mark Hertzberg/ZUMA Press Wire/REX/Shutterstock
Wisconsin’s supreme court is expected to rule on important gerrymandering, voting rights and abortion cases. Photograph: Mark Hertzberg/ZUMA Press Wire/REX/Shutterstock

Wisconsin judicial race: contenders chosen in pivotal election for 2023

This article is more than 1 year old

Liberal Janet Protasiewicz and conservative Daniel Kelly advance to final vote in state supreme court election

Wisconsin voters on Tuesday chose one liberal and one conservative candidate to face off in a race to determine control of the state supreme court in what is likely the most important election of 2023.

Janet Protasiewicz, a liberal Milwaukee circuit court judge, will be on the ballot against Daniel Kelly, a conservative former supreme court justice, in the state’s 4 April general election. Protasiewicz, who received 46% of the statewide vote, and Kelly, who received 24% of the statewide vote, advanced from a four-member field that included Everett Mitchell, a liberal judge in Dane county, and Jennifer Dorow, a conservative judge in Waukesha county.

Conservatives currently have a 4-3 majority on the court, but if Protasiewicz wins, the balance of the court would flip.

That would have an enormous impact in Wisconsin, one of the most politically competitive states in America that often determines the outcome of the presidential election. The court is expected to have a say in the near future on a range of major voting rights and abortion decisions.

In 2020, the state supreme court narrowly turned away a lawsuit from Donald Trump seeking to throw out votes. It is likely to weigh in on a range of election disputes ahead of the 2024 election in Wisconsin, where races are regularly decided by razor-thin margins. A shift in the balance of the court would also likely prompt a request asking the justices to reconsider striking down the state’s legislative maps, which are so severely gerrymandered in favor of Republicans it is virtually impossible for Democrats to ever win control of the state legislature.

The court will also likely ultimately decide whether the state’s 1849 abortion ban is legal.

“Everything we care about is going to be determined by who wins this election,” Protasiewicz said in victory remarks on Tuesday evening.

“Never before has a judicial candidate openly campaigned on the specific intent to set herself above the law, to place her thumb on the scales of justice to ensure the results satisfy her personal interest rather than the commands of the law,” Kelly said in his victory speech.

The race is already projected to shatter the $10m spending record for a state supreme court race, which was set in 2020. There were nearly $7m in political ad orders placed in the primary, according to the Brennan Center for Justice, which is tracking expenditures.

Spending in the race is expected to be dominated by outside groups. Fair Courts America, a Super Pac backed by GOP megadonor Richard Uihlein, has pledged millions in support of Kelly. The anti-abortion group Susan B Anthony Pro-Life America has also pledged six figures in support of Kelly. A Better Wisconsin Together, a liberal group, also spent nearly $1.8m so far, according to the Brennan Center’s database.

Most viewed

Most viewed