How war over trans rights is killing free speech at The Guardian: An exodus of women writers amid bullying allegations. A male columnist lashing out at anyone who disagrees with him. And an editor who's letting him get away with it

• e-mail

The father of the late journalist Malcolm Muggeridge once advised him: 'Never work for a liberal. They'll give you the sack on Christmas Eve.'

Perhaps because Muggeridge was once employed by the Guardian, this piece of advice has been taken by some to refer to that great, though sometimes infuriating, liberal newspaper.

On the surface it appears virtuous and high‑minded, but underneath there is a good portion of dirty washing, which it is not keen to share with the rest of the world.

An obvious example is Guardian Media Group's use of an offshore tax shelter in the Cayman Islands to avoid paying tax on the £302 million in profit it realised from the sale in 2007 of some of its shares in Auto Trader. The paper invariably decries tax avoidance in others.

The Guardian has been accused by one of its columnists of 'censoring' important discussions about gender identity (Pictured: Katharine Viner, editor-in-chief) 

I've written about many controversies at the paper over the years, but they largely pale into insignificance in comparison with the convulsions that have seized it for more than two years — and recently come to the boil.

The Guardian has been accused by one of its columnists of 'censoring' important discussions about gender identity. Hadley Freeman, who worked for the newspaper for 22 years, has resigned to go to another title.

In a valedictory letter to Katharine Viner, the editor-in-chief, which was leaked to Private Eye magazine, Freeman criticised the paper for abandoning its tradition of balance (which some may think has been more honoured in the breach than the observance).

Freeman alleged that the newspaper's once‑willing embrace of complex questions had disappeared with respect to the 'gender issue'. She also recalled being 'repeatedly warned off in the Corbyn era [from] writing about Labour from my perspective as a Jew'.

In normal circumstances, the resignation of a columnist, even one so relatively well‑known as Hadley Freeman, would hardly be deemed headline news.

But her embittered departure is the latest episode in a culture war that has been raging at the newspaper for more than two years. It is no exaggeration to say that Freeman is a casualty of 'cancel culture' in the 'gender wars'. As we shall see, she is far from being the only female Guardian journalist who has felt censored.

The controversies are an indication of divisions on the Left and gender issues within the Labour Party writes STEPHEN GLOVER. Sir Keir Starmer (pictured) refused to say in March during a radio interview whether a woman can have a penis

What is happening there is not merely alarming for those of us who, however much we may have been annoyed by it over the years, still respect the paper as a formidable bastion of Leftist thought.

The controversies are also an indication of the toxic divisions on the Left, and in particular within the Labour Party, about gender issues. After all, much to the dismay of some Labour MPs (let alone the rest of us) Sir Keir Starmer refused to say in March during a radio interview whether a woman can have a penis.

Hadley Freeman is no rabble-rouser. In an article for the online publication UnHerd in February — subsequently published in the Mail — she calmly laid out her reservations about the excesses of the trans lobby, and wrote 'that for the first time in my 20-plus years of being a liberal journalist, I felt completely isolated'.

In a later piece for the same publication, she criticised 'trans activists — and, most of all, [the LBGT lobby group] Stonewall — [for] pushing far beyond civil rights for trans people and insisting instead on unpopular and unworkable policies, such as trans women in sport, child transition and [opposition to] any open acknowledgement of female biology'.

Now I realise that most of us are mystified by the sometimes hysterical debate about an issue that seems peripheral to our everyday lives. But for a highly vocal minority, Hadley Freeman might as well have been lighting the touchpaper to the bonfire of their most cherished beliefs.

Owen Jones (pictured) is a significant figure. In fact, with his one million Twitter followers and his successful YouTube channel, this professional pugilist is one of the most influential people on the Left

Prominent amongst them was Owen Jones, a trans-rights activist who is a columnist on the Guardian, where he is held in unparalleled esteem by the aforementioned editor, Katharine Viner (who, by the way, recently married BBC presenter Adrian Chiles).

Very many Mail readers will be unaware of Jones's existence, but he is a significant figure. In fact, with his one million Twitter followers and his successful YouTube channel, this professional pugilist is one of the most influential people on the Left.

The Labour MP Jess Phillips has amusingly likened this former spear-carrier of Jeremy Corbyn's to 'a noisy, over-excited child who's had too much sugar'. That is a rather gentle appreciation. His detractors regard the pint-sized polemicist with a mixture of fear and loathing.

But he's clever and fluent and quick on the draw, and has used these attributes to his advantage on social media, where he expertly whips up his not usually very reflective followers, and sprays his critics with vitriol.

One of his occasional targets is the BBC, which he chooses to view as a reactionary outpost of the Conservative Party. Some of us see that as an eccentric standpoint, to put it mildly.

Jones has not yet responded on Twitter to Freeman's resignation, though he has lashed out at her as a colleague on that platform in the past. But there seems little doubt he has been instrumental in fostering a culture at the Guardian which she, with others, found intolerable.

The Labour MP Jess Phillips has amusingly likened this former spear-carrier of Jeremy Corbyn's to 'a noisy, over-excited child who's had too much sugar'

He has attacked several female Guardian journalists on social media over what he regards as their transphobic opinions without ever attracting any public censure from his indulgent editor. I've little doubt that on any other newspaper he would have been sacked.

His first major fight was with feisty fellow columnist Suzanne Moore more than two years ago. In March 2020, Jones was one of 338 Guardian Media Group employees (many working in America or Australia, and often not as journalists) who wrote a letter of complaint to Viner in response to a column by Moore which they deemed anti-trans.

Eight months later, Moore resigned, saying she felt 'bullied and betrayed' by her colleagues, who had reacted to her column standing up for women 'as if it was Mein Kampf'.

Owen Jones later tweeted: 'Suzanne Moore wasn't targeted or bullied, and nobody tried to get her fired — yet she's been able to pose as a free speech martyr silenced by the misogynist mob.' For her part, Moore described Jones in one of several articles about the contretemps as a 'twerp'.

Another woman journalist targeted by Jones was Sarah Ditum, a freelancer who writes for the Guardian. In August 2021, Jones denounced her to his Twitter followers as 'cruel', 'an unpleasant weird person' and an 'anti-trans activist'.

Ditum's 'sin' in Jones's eyes was to have written a seemingly inoffensive article in the Times about the late author Terry Pratchett and an odd dispute regarding where he might, or might not, have stood on transgender rights.

He has attacked several female Guardian journalists on social media over what he regards as their transphobic opinions without ever attracting any public censure from his indulgent editor

Sarah Ditum complained to Viner about Jones's attack. Catherine Bennett, a columnist on the Guardian's sister paper, the Observer, also complained that she had been bullied on social media by Jones and others after writing a piece about maintaining women's rights.

An independent investigator was brought in by Viner. A copy of the report was leaked to Private Eye. It found that Jones had breached social media guidelines and that 'his use of language had been personalised and demonstrated a lack of professionalism'.

Nonetheless, the irrepressible troublemaker gleefully tweeted: 'It is completely and utterly untrue that I was found guilty of bullying anyone at the Guardian.' This is strictly correct, but he was undoubtedly criticised in the report. Despite its perennial insistence on political transparency, the Guardian has not published it.

We shouldn't be surprised by Jones's characteristically self-righteous and unapologetic response. What is astonishing is that his protector, Katharine Viner, didn't publicly rebuke him.

Nor did she upbraid him when he laid into the Observer (of which she is editor-in-chief). Jones denounced it on Twitter as being 'on the wrong side of history' after it had published a leader on trans issues which didn't meet with his approval.

Why does Katharine Viner put up with Owen Jones? It may be that she agrees with his views about trans rights, and is unwilling to defend the feminist viewpoint of several of her female columnists.

It is also the case that, although Owen Jones is the most prominent champion of trans rights at the Guardian, he is far from being a lone voice. If Viner were to move against him, she might have a revolution on her hands.

During Viner's seven-year editorship, the Guardian has become the epicentre of fashionable woke thinking — more Left-wing and politically correct than ever, with a growing band of ever younger and increasingly strident pundits.

The paper has a new editorial tool called 'Typerighter' which does not merely correct poor English or bad punctuation but insists on politically correct terminology. The word 'aboriginal' is proscribed. Journalists are enjoined to write 'pro-choice' but never 'pro-life'.

There is perhaps another even more important reason why Jones is protected. The manic master of social media is simply too powerful to sack. He represents a new species of journalist. For him, the Guardian is merely one of several media platforms, and not necessarily the most important one.

The Guardian's average daily print sale has dwindled to well below 100,000 copies. The paper no longer releases official circulation figures, presumably out of fear of public embarrassment.

It is now a very successful international online newspaper. With his army of Twitter followers, Owen Jones is indispensable — a kind of recruiting sergeant drawing in readers and fomenting controversy. Politically, the Guardian increasingly aligns with him.

One wonders, though, how long Katharine Viner will be able to continue to patch up the bitter divisions between Jones and beleaguered female journalists. It is a fissure running through the paper.

The rift over trans issues in the Guardian is of course mirrored in the Labour Party. This is not just a row tearing apart a famous national newspaper. It involves the whole of the Left.

But the stand-off is particularly venomous at the Guardian, largely as a result of the influence of Jones, the editor's aggressive pet. I suspect we have only seen the beginning of this battle.

The Guardian — founded 201 years ago as the Manchester Guardian — used to be a great liberal newspaper. It still has some fine journalists. But it is in danger of being taken over by the intolerant, illiberal Hard Left.