Excess deaths concealed by excess deception

by PAUL COLLITS – COVID policy makers are determined to remain silent in the face of unassailable evidence that their totalitarian actions were devastating – both individually and nationally. 

The shutting down of societies, the useless mask mandates, the vaccine lies and the crushing of individual rights have been exposed, ad infinitum. 

In a country supposedly committed to the free and frank exchange of views, it appears that no one cares that no one cares.

Australia’s heroic COVID five – Alex Antic, Gerrard Rennick, Malcolm Roberts, Matt Canavan and Ralph Babet – refuse to lie down on the issue.

To their eternal credit they have stayed the course as policy distractions to bury COVID crimes have mounted. Wars, floods, Voices, climate crises, Bruce Lehrmann. And the rest.

EXCESS

One of the principal supporting claims of the truth-tellers has been “excess deaths”. That is the astonishing coincidence of a sharp increase in “all-cause deaths” that has occurred precisely from the time of the mass vaccine rollout.

Here is a definition: Excess mortality is a term used in epidemiology and public health that refers to the number of deaths from all causes during a crisis above and beyond what we would have expected to see under “normal” conditions.

In the case of COVID, several pre-pandemic years (2015-19) were used, both by the UK Government and by the OECD as base years for comparison.

The truth-tellers recently got a boost, with the British COVID hero Andrew Bridgen’s attempt to get the mother of parliaments (the House of Commons) to focus on the issue.

Bridgen MP, who was expelled from the Tory Party for speaking the truth, was granted 30 minutes to make his case. In the absence of a real inquiry.

The public gallery was full – and cheering. The floor of the House was … empty – and silent. All as the constituents of absent MPs on all sides continue to die, in record numbers, on their watch and without their interest.

It took Bridgen 20 attempts to have the Parliament agree to let him speak at all. That is serious censorship.

Here is what Bridgen had to say: “We have experienced more excess deaths since July 2021 than in the whole of 2020. Unlike during the pandemic, however, those deaths are not disproportionately of the old.

“In other words, the excess deaths are striking down people in the prime of life, but no one seems to care. I fear that history will not judge this House kindly.

“Worse still, in a country supposedly committed to the free and frank exchange of views, it appears that no one cares that no one cares.”

That line is chilling. No one cares that no one cares. It is the same in Australia.

As Bridgen says, no issue could be more serious. Certainly not Voices to parliament for selected racial groups.

He continues: “The surveillance systems designed to spot a safety problem have all flashed red, but no one is looking.”

NUT-JOB

Very odd for governments which, for over two years, claimed to be so vitally concerned about saving “every life” that they embarked upon a nut-job policy of “COVID zero”.

Some of Bridgen’s key points were:

  • The patterns were repeated across countries;
  • The rise in excess deaths has not let up;
  • It is almost impossible to get to the bottom of it, since data is hidden;
  • Statistics agencies manipulate data to minimise excessive death counts;
  • There are a significant number of young people among the death counts;
  • Excess deaths increased in 2022-23 among the old, when we should have expected fewer deaths among the old;
  • There was a sustained increase in ambulance call-outs;
  • There were rising disability payments.

The irony of what Bridgen calls “an eerie silence” over excess deaths is pretty astonishing.

We will all remember the daily doses of COVID propaganda, where unelected public health officials – who have mostly been since made governors (or the like) without ever being held accountable for their crimes and lies – and their political bosses held court and gave breathless updates of the deaths and injuries counts.

This went on every damned day for nearly two years. Then it suddenly all stopped.

They kept their jobs, unlike the many who refused the jab and did not keep theirs.

Back then they couldn’t stop talking about deaths. Now – nothing. Not a peep.

And when they were talking about deaths, they were largely fabricating a narrative  Like counting as “cases” irrelevant positive PCR tests among the perfectly healthy.

They were counting as COVID deaths anyone who died having had a positive PCR test.

There was the infamous case of a “COVID death” in the USA of someone who died having been run over by a bus.

FEAR

The American hospitals got more government money if you died of (with?) Covid.  And, of course, the greater the number of deaths broadcast daily, the greater the return to the State from public fear.

The existence of excess deaths since 2021 across Western countries is not in dispute.

What are disputed are the extent and, more importantly, the causes of the excess deaths.

But governments have figured, don’t let anyone talk about any of it! If we can just get the fact of excess deaths out of the news, well, no one will talk about what might have caused them.

And no one will figure that it was our State injectables that killed many of the people. Injectables that we forced the masses to take.

When you think of it, there have been a whole range of death types during COVID that governments have wanted to ignore, and for which they have enlisted various branches of the State to help suppress.

The list includes not only deaths from the poisonous vaccines, but the avoidable COVID deaths that resulted from the State’s decision to block effective non-vaccine treatments; deaths that directly or indirectly resulted from lockdown madness; the suicides; the old people killed by ventilators and end-of-life drugs; and the possibly millions of ill people who were denied timely treatments due to keeping the hospitals empty. Cancer patients are simply the most obvious.

FLUSH

A pretty impressive list, and every last category on the list was subject to determined efforts by governments to simply flush down the memory hole.

God knows how many deaths we are talking about, worldwide. The greatest health cover-up in history. No need for an inquiry, then.

And it isn’t just governments that have been on the case to suppress the issue of excess deaths. It is a whole-of-class effort.

The fact checker industrial complex is on board, seeking to besmirch those who seek to raise the issue and, especially, to link it to the vaccines.

The search engine monopoly provider does its bit as well. Search for any evidence about excess deaths or vaccine deaths and you will be referred straight to the establishment fact checkers.

The evidence on excess deaths is beyond compelling. And backed by “the science”.

The same “science” to which the COVID class endlessly appealed during the plandemic.

If it were a matter of mere correlation, it would be, you would think, worth an investigation. Even if only to debunk the “conspiracy theorists”.

CAUSATION

But when there is evidence of causation – links between excess deaths and vaccines – you would think it was a no brainer.

One autopsy-based study (by McCullough et al) found that 74 per cent of deaths-following-vaccines could be attributed to the vaccines. (Note that this study isn’t about excess deaths per se, but is germane to them).

The big story here, though, was the cancellation of the study by The Lancet after 24 hours.

The determination of the elites to kill this issue has been something to behold. Criminal brazenness doesn’t do it justice.

Dystopian Down Under’s Rebekah Barnett has drawn our attention to the crimes of Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration, among myriad bad actors.

The Daily Sceptic’s headline read: “Australia’s drug regulator admits it doesn’t know extent of COVID vaccine harm.”

It doesn’t know because it isn’t interested in knowing. Rather, it is interested in not knowing.

Barnett has also been looking at the attempts by the media to smear Bridgen, as part of the strategy to shore up the official narrative:

When dealing with inconvenient information that contradicts the power structure’s preferred narrative, legacy media functioning as a propaganda arm have two options:

  1. Don’t report it at all (i.e.: media blackout) or,
  2. Delegitimisation through framing techniques.

With Bridgen, the media’s response has involved both of Barnett’s two strategies – the silent treatment and delegitimisation.

The BBC actually overlaid the live stream of Bridgen’s speech in the House of Commons with video captions contradicting what he was saying. This is capital F “framing”. By the UK public broadcaster!

Barnett continues: “The BBC’s overt attempt at narrative control in the live-streaming of Bridgen’s address to UK Parliament, coupled with a media blackout on the debate in the remainder of the legacy media, offers a hint about the formation of power structures in the UK.

“In corporatist authoritarian societies, narrative control is part of the media’s broader role of manufacturing consent for government policies, and demand for the products of corporations.

BOTTOM-UP

“This top-down model is antithetical to the bottom-up classical liberal democratic model, in which those in charge are supposed to govern by the will of the people. In this model, the media have the dual mandate of keeping the public informed so that it can vote appropriately, and using their cultural authority to keep the government in check.”

Indeed. Barnett has also written of the recent campaign by the Australian Medical Professionals’ Society: “Earlier this year, Australian Senators voted down a motion calling for acknowledgment of Australia’s record-high excess deaths, and the need for an inquiry.”

Never in the history of public health have public health officials and their political superiors been so little interested in public health. On its face, it is hard to imagine a public health issue more important than a massive spike in excess deaths.

But it turns out that Andrew Bridgen does have friends. Coincidentally, US professor Mark Miller has shared this with his readers: “Dying of ‘vaccination’ (along with his mother), Pascal Najadi, son of WEF co-founder, calls for the arrest of Gates, Schwab, WHO leadership, Big Tech, Pfizer…”

One excess death of which, you might think, the elites might take some notice.

Rebel News notes: “Having successfully filed criminal charges against Swiss President [the soon-to-resign] Alain Berset for allegedly misleading the Swiss people on COVID-19 vaccinations, Pascal Najadi is now taking the fight to Pfizer.

As UK pharmacologist Mike Yeadon says of Najadi’s reported efforts to sue the Swiss Government and the complicit, Geneva-based institutions that ran global COVID policy: “Arranging events such that 5.7b people were injected with an intentionally harmful material is the greatest capital crime in human history.”

Nothing to see here? So it seems.PC

Paul Collits

MAIN PHOTOGRAPH:  Federal Health Minister Mark Butler. (courtesy Sky News Australia)

11 thoughts on “Excess deaths concealed by excess deception

  1. Please remember none of what they did was an accident, or in any way forgivable. They are already rolling out the, “mistakes were made; things were done” attempt to make their crimes less concrete.

    12
  2. Excellent article – thanks Paul Collits. Obviously there is a percentage of the population that still fall for all the hype about vaccines being necessary for our safety and protection. The bureaucracy is hoping that eventually the public will fall back into complacency and go along with the official narrative on the need for booster shots and other things such as the need for war, climate change is real and happening now, that we live in a democracy – yes we can vote but the leaders lie and do whatever they want when they get into power. People have the choice to either go along with mainstream media or do a bit of thinking for themselves.

    16
  3. Perhaps the lack of investigation into “Excess Deaths” is because they have another “Plandemic” coming and if we already knew about the deaths from the first one we wouldn’t be compliant with directions on the second?

    11
  4. I have been reading Homo Deus, by Yuval Noah Harari, the author of widely read Sapiens. Harari is now involved with the WEF. His book, Homo Deus has the subtitle- A Brief History of Tomorrow. This morning I read on page 381 that he used the term “useless masses” to describe the huge numbers of people who will be unemployed (and unemployable) by the coming advances in artificial intelligence. He asks; “What will they do all day? One answer might be drugs and computer games.” And goes on to say; “Unnecessary people might spend increasing amounts of time within 3D virtual-reality worlds…” Does that sound familiar already? Has anyone who has read this book by a very credible author with a PHD in History from Oxford, started to surmise that the reason we have such a lack of willingness to investigate excess deaths is simply that they are part of a plan to reduce the future numbers of “useless masses”? Those who have not read this book may scoff, but pick up his book and see what conclusion you come to. But hey, an added bonus of de-population will also be a lessening of emissions, making the world a more comfortable place for the elite who are among the survivors…

    11
    1. The “elites” have been planning on killing off masses of people they consider useless at least since the 1960s. Club of Rome, for example.

      12
  5. Want some statistical back up to increased deaths and injuries across all age groups?
    Then may I suggest an excellent place to go looking would be the work of actuaries inside Health and Life Insurance providers. To determine that insurance premiums are set at profitable levels, their job is to ensure the risks are compiled and statistically evaluated.

    10
  6. Irregular heartbeat, atrial fibrillation, not before the second Astra Zeneca vaccination and after that for the first time recorded by home blood pressure monitor.

    After heart tests and monitoring medication prescribed to lower the risk of a stroke from blood clotting.

    No comment from two doctors regarding the vaccinations and AF.

Comments are closed.