Hospitals have Reclassified Vaccines as ‘Biogenics,’ Allowing Injections without Consent + Dystopian Medicine (posted 11/24/25)
Are you contemplating a hospital stay? Check out the following first. Your life and bodily autonomy may depend on it:
Blanket Informed Consent for Biologics Could Be Deadly. What You Need to Know and Need to Do. By Dr. Sherri Tenpenny (11/01/25): tinyurl.com/5ekwjnn4
Hospitals Have Quietly Reclassified Vaccines as ‘Biogenics’ — Allowing Injections Without Consent. By Baxter Dmitry (10/27/25, includes video 03:14): tinyurl.com/bpajcwnx
Are you wondering why medicine has gone so off-track? Check out this interview:
From Gene-Edited Babies to ‘Bodyoids,’ the Brave New World of Modern Medicine. Host: Jan Jekielek. Guest: Dr. Aaron Kheriaty (11/19/25, podcast + video 56:17 min; video includes transcript but may require Epoch Times subscription)
Details below summarized with help from Grok ai (edited); images from articles.
__________
Summary: Blanket Informed Consent for Biologics Could Be Deadly. What You Need to Know and Need to Do. By Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
So please, before you sign anything: stop. Read. Ask. Refuse if you must. Line out what you don’t agree with, initial it, and date it. Your signature implies permission. — Dr. Sherry Tenpenny
Medical consent forms have changed, replacing "vaccine" with broader terms such as "biologics" and “biogenics,” potentially allowing administration of various products without specific patient awareness.
ED NOTE
We’ve used biologics below to mean both biologics and biogenics.
Definitions
Biologics: Therapeutic drugs and products from living organisms or components, regulated by the FDA.
Biogenics: Materials produced by living organisms or processes, broader than biologics. All biologics are biogenics, but not vice versa.
Consent Redefined Broad terms on consent forms now grant permission for FDA-approved products “deemed necessary,” without detailed discussion. Vaccines among approved biologics.
Informed Consent Originated in a 1957 California case from an American College of Surgeons brief. Modern forms are dense, hard to read, and use vague language, eroding true consent.
Medically Necessary Biologics Categorizing biologics as “necessary” makes refusal difficult. During procedures or anesthesia, patients might receive vaccines, antibodies, or blood products under blanket consent.
Biologics include vaccines, antibodies, gene therapy, blood, stem cells, proteins, and factors.
Side effects range from mild (irritation, nausea) to severe (infections, cancer, anaphylaxis).
Anesthesia Loophole Pre-operative forms authorize biologics during surgery when patients cannot consent. Court cases show risks of receiving biologics without specific approval.
What to Do
Read forms carefully; avoid vague terms without explanation.
Ask if form includes vaccines, gene therapies, or blood; document answers.
Refuse in writing on forms.
Get printed copies of signed forms.
Assign an advocate in case you are incapacitated.
Review records post-discharge.
Closing Advice
Doctors: Treat patients compassionately, converse, avoid rushing decisions to prevent anger and lawsuits.
Patients: Read, ask, refuse, and modify forms before signing.
__________
Summary: Hospitals Have Quietly Reclassified Vaccines as ‘Biogenics’ — Allowing Injections Without Consent. By Baxter Dmitry
Hospitals are replacing "vaccine" with "Biologics" or "Biogenics" on consent forms, potentially allowing administration of various biological products from living organisms or their byproducts without explicit patient consent.
FDA-Listed Biologics/Biogenics includes:
Vaccines
Gene therapy
Monoclonal antibodies
Whole blood and blood plasma
Blood platelets and red blood cells
Stem cells and T-cells
Growth factors
Allergenics and antitoxins
Recombinant proteins
Hormone replacement therapies
Immunotherapies
Botox
Vaccination Without Consent Forms allow staff to administer biologics / biogenics if deemed “necessary,” including during anesthesia when patients cannot object.
Language Shift from "vaccine" to "biologic" Confuses patients and avoids informed consent by using technical terms.
Right to Refuse Patients should read forms, refuse "Biologics or Biogenics" in writing, obtain signed copies, and verbally remind staff.
__________
Summary:From Gene-Edited Babies to ‘Bodyoids,’ the Brave New World of Modern Medicine. Host: Jan Jekielek. Guest: Dr. Aaron Kheriaty
Dr. Aaron Kheriaty discusses his book "Making the Cut: How to Heal Modern Medicine (a.co/d/4hmKWzs)," which covers concerning shifts in:
Medical ethics from Hippocratic principles to utilitarian approaches.
Modern healthcare.
Ethics of organ transplantation, gene editing, and emerging technologies like bodyoids and in vitro gametogenesis.
Kheriaty advocates for decentralization and acceptance of medicine's limits.
Ethical Shift Modern medicine is moving away from Hippocratic Oath's "do no harm" principle toward utilitarian ethics prioritizing the greater good over individual patients. Examples:
Euthanasia, transgender surgeries removing healthy organs, and late-term abortions not threatening the mother's life.
Expanded dead-donor criteria for organ donations.
Technologies including germ-line gene editing for "designer babies."
In vitro gametogenesis (IVG) using stem cells to create lab-made eggs and sperm.
Book Overview and Personal Background Book is part memoir of medical training, philosophy of medicine, and critique of contemporary healthcare.
Entered medical school after studying philosophy, feeling like an anthropologist observing a foreign culture.
Highlights astonishing experiences, such as dissecting cadavers in anatomy lab.
Book is both a love story for medicine and a critique of its deviations.
Medical Training Vignettes
Assisted in a leg amputation due to gangrene, holding the severed leg and placing it in a biohazard bag.
Transplantation surgeons replace organs such as livers from deceased donors, raising ethical and philosophical issues.
Organ Transplantation and Dead Donor Rule In China, forced organ harvesting provides organs quickly without ethical constraints.
Western medicine adheres to “dead donor rule,” requiring death before harvesting unpaired organs. But rule is relaxed for utilitarian reasons to save more lives. Laxity connected to U.S. engagement with China influencing ethical softening.
Hippocratic vs. Utilitarian Medicine
Hippocratic: Loyalty to individual patient, treating all equally and using skills only for healing; oath prohibits deadly drugs or confidentiality breaches.
Utilitarian: Includes non-healing purposes such as assisted suicide, euthanasia, capital punishment, torture, or gender-affirming procedures amputating healthy parts. Could justify killing one person to harvest organs that save multiple others (based on historical eugenics).
Historical Examples of Utilitarian Ethics
U.S. eugenics laws in early 1900s lead to forced sterilizations; upheld in Buck v. Bell (1927, tinyurl.com/3kp2r62d).
Nazi Germany adopted U.S. models, evolving to killing disabled individuals in psychiatric hospitals; society viewed as an organism to purge "cancers."
Nuremberg Code emphasizes informed consent (US never signed on!).
Greater Good in Medicine and Society
Good Hippocratic medicine indirectly achieves greater good as a downstream effect.
Triage should focus on medical need and survival likelihood, not societal value, to avoid discrimination.
Technological Diminishing Returns and Healthcare Critique
U.S. healthcare spends twice as much as other nations but ranks low in outcomes due to top-down control homogenizing care like an industrial system.
"Turnstile medicine" focuses on throughput, complications handled under bundled payments.
Solution: Decentralization, patient responsibility, and accepting medicine's limits to reduce iatrogenic harms (third leading cause of death); iatrogenic defined: tinyurl.com/ybxvr4ys
Limits of Medicine and Death
Medicine excels at acute trauma but fails and sometimes worsens chronic illnesses.
Seeing death as conquerable leads to harm.
Transhumanism's radical life extension is illusory and potentially dehumanizing.
Emerging Technologies and Ethical Concerns
Gene Editing: Individual therapy editing less controversial; germline editing affects descendants without consent, risking unintended consequences. Chinese CRISPR babies enhanced immunity without treating disease.
Bodyoids: Proposal to create brainless human bodies from stem cells for research, organs, and testing; these creations are profoundly disabled humans, not non-humans, akin to anencephaly (defined: tinyurl.com/58vuw5kv).
In Vitro Gametogenesis (IVG): Reprograms skin cells into gametes, enabling same-sex reproduction, parenting genetically related to multiple adults, or non-consensual reproduction (e.g., from celebrities). Combines with IVF for embryo farming and consumer-driven eugenics selecting traits.
Final Thoughts Dr. Kheriaty urges societal steering away from financial or ideological control. Advocates collective input to ensure humanizing effects, not dehumanization. Everyone — not just “experts” — has a stake.
Related: