The app for independent voices
Idaho Legislature – VOTE YES on S1264 - Rural health transformation (Posted: 02/10/26)
Link: legislature.idaho.gov/s…
See bill link above for current status and committee assignment
See Idaho Insider for links where you can send group emails based on current status and committee assignment: gemstatechronicle.com/l…
Summary (ai assisted)
S1264 establishes the Idaho Rural Health Transformation Fund for federal grant moneys and the Rural Health Transformation Committee to oversee fund use for rural health programs.
S1264 appears identical to S1253 except for the composition of the Rural Health Transformation Committee:
Idaho Rural Health Transformation Fund (created in the state treasury)
Consists of federal rural health transformation program grant moneys and legislative appropriations.
Used solely for federally approved rural health transformation purposes, subject to legislative appropriation upon committee recommendation.
Subject to annual public reporting of receipts and expenditures.
Key Differences between S1253 and S1264 (ai assisted)
Committee Composition (Section 56-2502(1)): Total members: 6 in S1253; 7 in S1264.
Senate members: 2 in S1253 (1 cochair); 3 in S1264 (1 cochair).
House members: 2 in S1253 (1 cochair); 3 in S1264 (1 cochair).
Nonvoting members (selected by governor): 2 in S1253; 1 in S1264.
All other provisions, including fund creation, purposes, committee powers/duties, rural district requirement (at least 3 legislative members), and emergency clause, are identical.
Rural Health Transformation Committee (7 members, S1264)
Three Senate members appointed by president pro tempore, one as cochair.
Three House members appointed by speaker, one as cochair.
One nonvoting member selected by governor.
At least three legislative members from districts without population centers of 20,000 or more.
Terms coincide with legislative election terms; vacancies filled by appointing authority; reappointments allowed.
Committee remains active until all fund moneys are appropriated and expended.
Committee has powers and duties to:
Establish governance rules.
Establish additional subaward requirements, including scoring rubrics, by March 15, 2026, for first year and September 30 for remaining four years.
Establish expedited award review process with Department of Health and Welfare, aligning with federal timelines in Idaho's plan.
Receive no less than quarterly updates on progress, expenditures, and outcomes from the department.
Evaluate potential and actual success of funded programs.
Retain oversight of fund moneys.
Require sustainability plans for funded initiatives.
Make recommendations to legislature on fund use within federal plan parameters.
Fiscal impact: No General Fund appropriation (but what happens after the federal money goes away?)
Reasons for Recommendation to VOTE NO on 1264
Key reasons (details follow):
Makes Idaho dependent, yet again, on Federal funding with massive strings attached.
Idaho loses its sovereignty every time it takes federal money.
Not needed or wanted by many in rural areas.
Federal guidelines would declare most of Idaho rural, which means less money is available for truly “rural” areas.
Likely to benefit large hospital systems, many of which are controlled by federal policies or corporatist donors and viewpoints that conflict with rural values.
Strongly resembles ARPA funding, upon which Idaho became dependent and ended up with “shortfalls” after federal money dried up.
Idaho Senator Glenneda Zuiderveld summed it up well (read the article in Related links for full details):
The Rural Health Transformation Program was authorized by the federal “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” which allocates $50 billion nationwide… Idaho alone is slated to receive nearly $1 billion over five years.
The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare and Governor Brad Little determined, on their own, that Idaho “needs” this funding. The application was completed and the grant approved without any vote of the Legislature.
In further neglect of the constitutional responsibilities vested in the legislative branch, the Governor then created a task force, comprised largely of unelected officials, to decide how, when, and where this money will be spent.
This program also adds 13 full-time temporary government positions. We are told these positions last only five years, but we have seen this before. Positions created with ARPA funding were labeled “temporary” as well, yet many remain today long after the money is gone.
In short, the executive branch is sidestepping the legislative branch…
_____
What is the solution?
Idaho should adopt policy that prevents the executive branch and its appointed agencies from independently applying for large federal grants that create long-term obligations.
The Idaho Constitution assigns budgeting authority and oversight to the Legislative Branch. Those decisions must start there, not be presented after commitments are already made.
Let’s learn from the mistakes made with the ARPA-Covid 23 billion, money that we stole from our grandchildren. — Senator Glenneda Zuiderveld
In her article, Sen. Zuiderveld explains that nearly ALL of Idaho would be considered “rural” for the purposes of this funding. She points out this money could primarily benefit large hospital systems such as St. Luke’s and St. Al’s. (These systems already enjoy massive tax benefits as nonprofits while delivering often questionable healthcare. We know or know of several people who were hurt, killed, misdiagnosed, or subjected to “mandated hospital protocols” at one of these large systems.)
After learning about massive daycare fraud throughout the land, and the specifics of this huge grant for “rural healthcare” we’re angrier than ever about misuse of tax dollars funneled from federal government to states (we were very much against ARPA funding and its aftermath; as Sen. Zuiderveld explains, this funding scheme is ARPA 4.0).
Shame on President Trump, Idaho’s federal legislators, our governor, and Idaho’s Department of Health & Welfare, all of whom are touting this Rural Health Transformation Program funding’s wonderfulness!
STATE LEGISLATORS MUST SAY NO TO THE FEDERAL DRUG OF DEPENDENCY THROUGH GRANTS!
More Ranting…
__________
💸 Beleaguered Taxpayer Comments
The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the Government and I'm here to help. — President Reagan's famous and prescient quote from August 12, 1986 News Conference: youtube.com/watch?v=nCe…
While legislators ponder daycare fraud, we ask that they also investigate what will happen to all the beautiful taxpayer money Trump's One Beautiful Bill Act (OBBA) will generously gift to “help” Idaho's rural residents?
As rural Idaho residents, we can tell you that many do not want this “help,” which likely will bring more people into once pristine, low-crime areas. Newcomers often demand ever more “citified” services that could destroy rural residents' environment, lifestyle, independence, resilience, and — yes — their health. (Of course, media, politicians, and others who control the purse strings will disagree vehemently.)
Throwing money at “healthcare access, affordability” — with or without accountability safeguards — will not provide healthcare access and affordability any more than throwing money into Obamacare and student loans made healthcare premiums and college more accessible and affordable. Instead, with government (i.e., taxpayer) subsidies, costs went up while access went down. And, of course, strings were attached.
Abuse and socialist policies are inevitable when government sloshes other people's money to bureaucrats, NGOs, health boards, etc. for redistribution to “the underserved.” Lots of money gets caught in the middleman's net and often funds solutions that don't work.
Example: We've watched meetings of Central District Health (CDH), which serves populous Ada County as well as more rural Boise, Elmore, and Valley counties. Many “services” provided are pure socialism or downright dangerous to health; the hearings quite appalled us. CDH meetings on YouTube: youtube.com/channel/UC4…
Can't the legislature JUST SAY NO to federal dollars, pretty please?
Federal Money Is Not Free Money! Vote NO on 1264!
Related
Senate Bill 1264 — Rural health transformation (-3). By Idaho Freedom Foundation: tinyurl.com/3yta24b3
Senate Bill 1253 — Rural health transformation (-3). By Idaho Freedom Foundation: tinyurl.com/p9hdfe9e
Idaho Legislature – VOTE NO on S1253 - Rural health transformation: tinyurl.com/26jx8z8e
Press Release: December 30, 2025 - Idaho awarded nearly $1 billion to improve rural healthcare access, affordability: tinyurl.com/56nabh62
Idaho Department of Health & Welfare: Rural Health Transformation Program Grant: tinyurl.com/5n7jvj36
The well-funded demise of rural America. By Wayne Hoffman (Substack Note with links): tinyurl.com/45zh9tmc
ARPA 4.0? Idaho’s Rural Health Grant Raises Familiar Red Flags. Government by Task Force: Idaho’s Quiet Shift. By Senator Glenneda Zuiderveld (Substack Note with links): tinyurl.com/3xj8y4bw
Rojas Report (provides clarity, autonomy, and unapologetic strategy for physicians, investors, brokers, and anyone else fed up with a health system that’s bloated, opaque, and allergic to competition): dutchrojas.substack.com
Idaho Legislature 2026 Bills to Support or Oppose: tinyurl.com/yc2jpkeh
