The app for independent voices
Idaho Legislature – VOTE YES on H0896 - State law, compliance (Posted: 03/17/26)
Link: legislature.idaho.gov/s…
See bill link above for current status and committee assignment
See Idaho Insider for links where you can send group emails based on current status and committee assignment: gemstatechronicle.com/l…
Summary (ai assisted)
📌NOTE: H0896 (this bill) is a much watered-down version of H0743 (predecessor, legislature.idaho.gov/s…).
We suspect constitutional concerns and objections by elected officials required a “softer” bill than H0743 (predecessor). H0896 (this bill) is the softer bill.
Grok analysis link of differences H0896 (this bill) and H0743 (predecessor): grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…
Grok analysis link for H0896 (this bill): grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…
H0896 establishes procedures for enforcing statutory prohibitions against public officers, employees, and entities (excluding legislative and judicial branches). It takes effect immediately upon passage and approval.
Legislative Findings and Intent
Legislature finds elite impunity is a serious problem in the United States and public servants acting above the law bring disrepute. H0896 provides consequences for disregard of the law.
Definitions
Prohibition: Statutory proscription directly applicable to public officers, employees, or entities.
Public employee: Person employed by a public entity or officer.
Public entity: State agencies (except legislative/judicial), public schools, charter schools, school districts, independent public bodies, political subdivisions, or other public organizations created by Idaho Constitution or statute.
Public officer: Elected or appointed officeholder created by Idaho Constitution or statute (except legislative/judicial branches).
Referral Process
Governor, Senate president pro tempore, House speaker, or county board chairman (for any taxing district in the chair’s own county) may refer potential prohibition violations to the Attorney General.
Notice and Cure
Attorney General gives notice of alleged violation.
Recipient has 14 days to acknowledge and cure or deny.
Failure to respond equals denial.
Acknowledgment allows 14 days to cure by ceasing violation.
Successful cure bars enforcement action.
Enforcement Action
If denied, no response, or uncured, Attorney General may file action to enforce (only if underlying law has no penalty or enforcement mechanism).
Court issues compliance order by preponderance of evidence, naming responsible persons.
Noncompliance is contempt.
Prevailing party receives attorney’s fees.
Disqualification Action
Attorney General may additionally seek court order disqualifying willful violators from public office or employment for up to 5 years (clear and convincing evidence).
Action allowed only after enforcement filing.
Does not apply to state officers subject to election.
Prevailing party receives attorney’s fees.
Alternate Counsel
Affected parties may retain non-Attorney General counsel, paid from appropriated funds.
Constitutional Considerations
No direct contradictions with U.S. or Idaho Constitution identified.
Bill excludes legislative and judicial branches from coverage and bars disqualification actions against elected state officers.
Reason for Recommendation to VOTE YES on H0896
Idaho has seen cases in which public officials not only failed to uphold laws enacted by the legislature but openly flouted them. These laws had no teeth. Thus, the people (through the Attorney General and other law enforcement officials) were powerless to stop the scofflaws.
Highly publicized example: Boise Mayor Lauren McLean flew unofficial Pride and Organ Donation flags at City Hall despite state law prohibiting government entities from displaying flags other than specified official banners (ktvb.com/article/news/l…). McLean and city council later made Pride flags “official,” sidestepping the law.
Idaho’s Attorney General and other law enforcement were powerless to do anything because:
Specific laws failed to include penalties for non-compliance. That is, these laws had no teeth. (Legislature must fix this problem by adding penalties for non-compliance when writing individual laws.)
No general provisions existed to penalize non-compliance with toothless laws. (H0896 helps fix this problem.)
📌 NOTE: Public officials may be justified for non-enforcement of blatantly unconstitutional laws and rules, such as the outrageous trampling of constitutional, unalienable, natural human rights enacted during COVID era tyranny (some of these laws/rules remain active). See Declaration of Independence for justification.
Please vote YES on H0896.
Related
Law & Order: Why HB 743 Is Important for Idaho Taxpayers. By Scott Herndon (02/25/2026):
Article: us17.campaign-archive.c…
Grok Summary: grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…
Bonds for the Win (a little known way to use surety bonds when contracts with the people are broken): bondsforthewin.com
From the website: “Surety bonds provide financial guarantees that bondholders such as public officials, companies, contractors, or unions will uphold their contracts according to mutual terms. Surety bonds protect WE THE PEOPLE from fraud and malpractice. When a bondholder breaks a bond’s terms, the harmed party can make a claim on the bond to recover losses.”
Declaration of Independence: archives.gov/founding-d…
Idaho Legislature 2026 Bills to Support or Oppose: tinyurl.com/yc2jpkeh
