Observation: I’m noticing a clear "authenticity ceiling" in recent political messaging. Candidates and influencers keep using performative playbooks to curate hyper-aggressive social media moments intending to trigger viral engagement, yet the returns are diminishing
The Diagnostic: I am a Xennial who grew up analog and was at the start of the digital era. Many of these ideas came from a 20-year Active Duty USAF career studying high-trust building and development. Current political performatization fails because it is noise over coherence. Voters know this and appear to understand that character-inauthenticity. is not about better performance but a signal that the person is the same regardless of politics.
The Polymodern Shift: The polymodern character research emphasizes that society and institutions are hitting a wall where performance no longer compensates for character. Future leadership is not about cosplay, LARPing, or slick viral slop—it is about authentic character-coherence.
Query: If you understand culture, what do you use to spot performance over substance? I’m stress-testing this core idea around the polymodernity character framework as part of my upcoming dissertation and am curious whether others see the same authenticity gap.
May 31
at
4:50 PM
Relevant people
Log in or sign up
Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.