youtu.be/l78YU_MnTqg
"Response to Elle Interview"
The End of Celebrity Hypocrisy
Edition
The trend of celebrities hopping on performative train
I can’t take the "take" seriously anymore. We have reached a point where celebrity performative activism needs to end. Billie Eilish has told on herself; her own Cognitive Dissonance is on full display. I agreed with her back in February regarding stolen land and her fuck ICE stance—those were important messages that actually meant something. But by April, she became overexposed and, dare I say, insufferable. I’m taking a break from her as an artist. I could have been a lot harsher for her recent backlash last month.
The Peer Perspective: 2001 and the "Almost Twin"
She was born just eight months after me. We are almost twins, born in the same year—2001. But while she was still waiting, I was born early; I couldn’t wait that long to get out and face the world. We’re both grown-ass women now, but our paths couldn't be more different. She gave us permission to criticize her the second she started saying stupid shit. Her take lacked nuance, and that’s what made the fandom side-eye her.
The "Sour Milk" Paradox
Her past self once criticized how annoying some vegans are—those were her words. She used to say she would never be that person. Those words have aged like sour milk. Now she’s panned as the "Vegan Teacher" nobody asked for. She used to be a respectable artist; now, she is a laughing damn joke. She did that in 24 hours. She is chronically online—the worst combo for a career killer.
survive. I’ve moved on to a Mediterranean diet that supports my health. I practice discipline with dry months where I abstain entirely, and I enjoy white wine in moderation—it’s that one glass recommended by health experts. Your "world ideal" is not a real ideal for people with health issues. Your $5.00 oat milk isn't an option when I'm balancing my survival on a real-world budget.
The Committee Meeting
Her performative activism has the same energy as showing up late to a committee meeting to lecture everyone on their carbon footprint after they’ve already finished the work and gone home. She has the damn nerve to lecture us on Cognitive Dissonancefrom a $53 million safety net, while we are making real, sustainable choices on a budget.
The Corporate Receipts
The hypocrisy is undeniable. While she lectures you, she is building a wardrobe of Gucci leather and Prada wool, and partnering with non-cruelty-free brands like Maybelline. She even teamed up with billionaire James Cameron for her concert film, despite her public rhetoric demanding that billionaires donate their wealth. You can’t be a "climate activist" and run massive world concerts—you can't do both. It’s a pattern: lecture the masses from a pedestal while you live by a completely different set of rules.
The 2031 Haunting
Part of being an adult is that she is supposed to accept accountability for once—admitting your opinion is black and white. Not even that she can do, so she made things worse for herself; under pressure, she doubled down. Now she is “cancelled.” This will continue in 2031. That’s the thing about the internet: it haunts you down. Instead of being remembered as the innovative youngest artist in the 21st century for reigniting alternative music, she is now the internet vegan teacher that nobody asked for.
The Scientific Receipt
It is a massive red flag when a Wildlife Biologist calls out your "black and white" thinking. When the experts tell you your logic is flawed, you can't hide behind a "stay mad" post. You don't want PETA on your agenda—they do the opposite of animal welfare. Look at Zendaya—she is a vegetarian, but she isn't in your face. She stays chill. Why can't you?
Medical Reality vs. Hardcore Ideals
I was a hardcore vegan once. I had my Trader Joe’s soybean ice cream runs and my tofu with barbecue sauce. But my "hardcore" diet broke when I was diagnosed with anemia. What finally broke it? Chick-fil-A. It literally broke my vegan diet at the time because I needed to survive. Is that okay, food police? Because I’m eating it. I need balance and protein-rich food. Does movie popcorn have butter in it? I don’t know, but I’m eating that too. Your "world ideal" is not a real ideal for people with health issues. Your $5.00 oat milk isn't an option when I'm balancing my survival on a real-world budget.
What I notice about the Elle interview is that it actually set her up for failure. They asked her something controversial, and in order to save her career, she could have denied it—but she has clearly never been media-trained. More than that, this vegan diet discourse has been going on for 47 years. This debate was tired before we were even born in 2001. Instead of being remembered as an innovative artist, she is just repeating an old script—the internet vegan teacher that nobody asked for.
The Corporate and Political Paradox
You can’t be a "climate activist" and run massive world concerts—you can't do both. You teamed up with billionaire James Cameron while demanding other billionaires donate. It is performative activism. We see the same blueprint with Taylor Swift. She does the bare minimum—like her posturing during the midterm elections—to look involved without risking her brand. It’s a pattern: lecture the masses from a $53 millionpedestal while you live by a completely different set of rules.
Poetic Justice: Therefore I Am
The press articles act with a confused indifference. C'est l'indifférence totale. For the sake of poetic justice, let's look at the lyrics. She wrote "I'm not your friend, damn" when we were 18 turning 19. I turned 19 earlier that year. Now, I’m using your own words against you. I am the one who is not your friend. You think you are "the man"? No. Stop. What the hell are you even talking about? We are not the same because the world is not a real ideal. Your "world ideal" is a luxury I can't afford. Nous ne sommes pas les mêmes.
The Struck Nerve: Personal Choice
Another reason I am so pissed off is that she attacked my personal diet and lifestyle. I disagree with her entire premise, and I literally roll my eyes at her lectures. Why? Because I’ve already been doing the work. I’ve switched to Chemical-Free Laundry—no longer using harsh chemicals in my home. I use Tupperware with eco-friendly wrapping; it is never plastic wrapping.
I was a hardcore vegan once. I had my Trader Joe’s soybean ice cream runs. But my diet broke when I was diagnosed with anemia. What finally broke it? Chick-fil-A. It literally broke my vegan diet at the time because I needed to survive. I’ve moved on to a Mediterranean diet that supports my health. I practice discipline with dry months where I abstainentirely, and I enjoy white wine in moderation—it’s that one glass recommended by health experts. Your "world ideal" is not a real ideal for people with health issues. Your $5.00 oat milk isn't an option when I'm balancing my survival on a real-world budge.
The Struck Nerve: Personal Choice
Another reason I am so pissed off is that she attacked my personal diet and lifestyle. To be honest, it’s none of her damn business. I disagree with her entire premise, and I literally roll my eyes at her lectures. Why? Because I’ve already been doing the work. I’ve switched to Chemical-Free Laundry; no longer using harsh chemicals in my home. I use Tupperware with eco-friendly wrapping; it is never plastic.
I was a hardcore vegan once. I had my Trader Joe’s soybean ice cream runs. But my diet broke when I was diagnosed with anemia. What finally broke it? Chick-fil-A. It literally broke my vegan diet because I needed to survive. I’ve moved on to a Mediterranean diet that supports my health. I practice discipline with dry months where I abstain entirely, and I enjoy white wine in moderation—it’s that one glass recommended by health experts.
I am an animal lover, and it’s like saying to her: you can’t claim to be a "vegan lover" while supporting animal cruelty products. Her logic doesn’t make any damn sense; it hurts your damn brain trying to follow it. If I wanted a lecture, I’d go to a college seminar, not listen to one from a peer.
The Only Damn Difference
The internet already gave her hell two weeks ago; this is just my turn to respond. I’m not tearing her a brand new one only because the backlash has never died down—she pissed off a lot of people. But for me, I can't separate the art from the artist anymore. I am just annoyed. "Stay mad" is a weak argument; it’s the equivalent of saying "get fucked" back when we were teenagers online.
"Stay mad" is a weak argument—it’s the equivalent of saying "get fucked" back when we were teenagers online. I am also a young twenty-something; I can be impulsive, passionate as hell and petty, too. My "crash outs" are different; the only difference is I don’t make them public.
The only damn difference between you and me, Billie, is this: I keep my opinions private. I am a private citizen. I actually sign the petitions on change.org while you just post a statement to your story. You clearly do give a fuck, despite the fact that you claim to be "unbothered."
The Total Boycott
I am a Critical Superfan. However, until the receipts match the rhetoric, I am done. My light boycott starts now. I won’t listen between May and October. The last time I listened was May 8.
I am ignoring the merch, the perfumes, and any email with the name Eilish in it. The light boycott ends when she is less in the news and less insufferable, which will be for a while.
Billie, let this be a lesson: don't comment on everyone's survival if you aren't prepared to live by your own rules. Time for a relisten of Therefore I Am. No, Billie—you are not the greatest at the moment.