Yet another example of the kind of coverage that is so distractingly wrong that it makes it hard to focus on the supposed bigger issue. I continue to be mystified by editors who feel they need to do stuff like this
The New York Times gets ever more Orwellian in its effort to rewrite the story of Kilmar Abrego García's tattoos
You made it, you own it
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
More love, indeed! We can lay the foundations of a new social architecture based on respect for each other. No need for silly macho posturing. No need for toxic hetero-normative, binary notions. Let's crush the most insidious aspects of the patriarchy (i.e. the oppression of women and minorities, bullying, etc.) and soldier on, poised to achieve dignity for everyone.