Brad DeLong on Substack: "Neofascism: Starting in January 2001 I have presumed it 50-50 that people arguing the Supreme Court was not deeply corrupt were themselves deeply corrupt, and lying. The needle has only moved left since then: It is now 100%-0%: Julian Sanchez: ‘Maybe I’ll be proven hilariously …"

∙

Neofascism: Starting in January 2001 I have presumed it 50-50 that people arguing the Supreme Court was not deeply corrupt were themselves deeply corrupt, and lying. The needle has only moved left since then: It is now 100%-0%:

Julian Sanchez: ‘Maybe I’ll be proven hilariously wrong, but I think people are wildly overestimating the extent to which the conservative justices have any real interest in protecting Trump personally. They don’t have primaries. They don’t have to pretend to like him…
Julian Sanchez: ‘I have been proven hilariously wrong. There is no real way to account for the delay and certiorari grant on an obviously frivolous immunity argument except as an effort to do Trump a political favor… <threads.net/@normative/post/C36e08bLka0>

threads.net

Julian Sanchez (@normative) on Threads

I have been proven hilariously wrong. There is no real way to account for the delay + cert grant on an obviously frivolous immunity argument except as an effort to do Trump a political favor.

Likes

∙

Restack