The app for independent voices

The “no nukes” thing is fun. I mean “nuclear fission weapons have not been shown to work”.

I have to admit, I believed civilian nuclear power stations were broadly as described. I saw no necessary conflict and, like everyone else, reasoned that the gigawatts of energy weren’t fake.

After reading Dr Michael Palmers free pdf book, “Hiroshima Revisited”, I recognised the hallmarks of the PsyOp.

So, how do you go about faking a blast equivalent to a 20 kilo ton pile of TNT?

I’ve asked a four year old & a six year old and both knew the answer immediately. You’ve got it already.

Just the photography from the “bomb test” location in USA ought to arouse suspicion.

Visitors to Hiroshima shortly after its destruction by an expert who’d toured numerous such destroyed cities was unable to identify anything that distinguished Hiroshima. The profile of sickness of those not killed in the firebombing was in accord with mustard gas poisoning, just like in WW1. Obviously there was rapidly no nuclear waste problem because they rapidly rebuilt the cities. Surveys in the sediments in the nearby lakebed did recover some radionuclides expected from an atomic bomb but some elements were literally missing, a radionuclide of plutonium. Later surveys did find plutonium but the dating of the annual mud deposition showed that this arrived in the lake after 1945. The fraud just goes on and on.

There’s a guy who once was an explosives & deep sea diving expert. It’s what he used to do for a living. He points out that ALL explosions involved the very rapid elaboration of gases. That’s what explosions are. None of the purported nuclear reactions produce gas as a byproduct.

Steven A Young is a nuclear physicist who describes why atom bombs aren’t a thing even from a theoretical standpoint. He realised in his detective work that nuclear power stations also could not work. Yet, lots of electricity is produced by them. How? While he doesn’t have a complete answer (or if he did, i didn’t understand it!) he thinks there’s an alchemical reaction going on in the fuel rods involving “yellow cake” (a purified uranium ore, iirc) in the absence of oxygen and this liberates enormous amounts of energy as heat. This is what drives the steam turbines.

As is usual in grand deceptions, most people who work in and around the fields of “strategic nuclear defense” have no idea what is happening behind the screens, shell casings, fuel rods etc etc. They will nevertheless fiercely defend their positions.

Recall that we acquire knowledge in two fundamentally different ways. First, there are things you’ve demonstrated empirically yourself. You may be wrong but if so, it’s your error. The second way I describe thus: “Someone told you & you chose to believe it. Unfortunately, the vast majority of what we think we know for sure belongs to the second category.

Mark Twain said, “Its not what you don’t know that’s the problem. The problem is those things you absolutely know that just ain’t so”.

Hey Richard, well it is quite difficult to do specific articles on every fraud in science because there are only 24 hrs in a day. For that reason I go for the fundamentals and show that if they cannot work, the rest logically must be flawed. I.e what is a Neutron? How is it verified, show me an image of it. If there is nothing tangible t…

Jan 10
at
12:57 PM

Log in or sign up

Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.