>Gaza (a population living under the authority of a sovereign who doesn’t give them political rights and diminishes their quality of life

Aside from being untrue, this is also totally irrelevant to the point. You, and all of the other activists, are completely unwilling to acknowledge that the methods Hamas uses are both evil and unhelpful. This in turn makes everyone tune you out.

And again, it's not true. Gaza is not under Israeli rule in almost any way that matters. They aren't rebelling again…

Both you and chatGPT made the same misinterpretation. The "axiom" was the subsequent sentence, that motivations are best revealed through observing actions, and that is indeed one I'd apply universally.

If a movement insists on the same tactics which have consistently set material goals backwards while advancing ideological ones, then it's perfectly reasonable to conclude that ideology is the primary driver. Either explain to me how suicide bombings and concert massacres actually advance materia…

The worst thing that happened to multiculturalism was seeing what impact the conflict in Gaza had on local conditions. Who wants to live like that?

Like, Israel-Palestine as an intellectual topic for coffee shops or university campuses? Fine. Having to deal with emboldened Islamists in the street or battles with hooligans? Nope. People have their own problems.