Notes
I recently noticed that subscribed to Nevermore.
I am not deeply familiar with his work, but he blew my mind with his “WWII never ended” piece, so I was stoked to see that my work has attracted the interest of one of the O.G. conspiracy theorists in the whole wide world.
I have started following Jon’s work, and have noticed that praises him highly, which surprised me somewhat, given that seems to be the unofficial dean of the “viruses-don’t-exist” crowd.
Now, seems to me like it keeps getting harder and harder to ignore them types, don’t it?
If is a virus-denier, that’s big news, isn’t it?
Isn’t she one of the most respected journalists in the world? She ranks right up with Whitney Webb, , , and the King of the Limited Hangout himself, Mr. , if you ask me, and unlike all the people I just named, she’s been covering the virus beat for decades. She’s more of an expert on viruses than any other famous journalist, isn’t she?
The world spent decades ignoring her heroic journalism reporting on the corruption of Big Pharma during the AIDS era. I can only imagine what kinda hell she lived through for years on end.
Hopefully we’ve all learned our lesson. She is an expert on virology and we should listen to what she has to say about it.
If she’s saying that it’s bullshit from top to bottom, I think we should take her seriously.
Recently, I watched interview Jame Corbett of and both thinkers discussed the “rabid” contingent of the truth movement that insists that viruses don’t exist.
They seemed annoyed at the overzealousness of some people, but my takeaway was this ... if neither of these men, who are among the best informed people in the world, are able to refute the arguments of the anti-virus crowd, it stands to reason that there’s a reason, and the simplest one that I can think of is that it’s because the anti-virus crowd are right.
We all know the frustration that comes when you win a debate with a normie but they refuse to concede you’ve won. Is this what’s going on here?
Now, I have way better things to do than educate myself about microbiology, and I’m not qualified to weigh in on “the Science”, but it seems to me like the “viruses-don’t-exist” crowd are winning the debate.
Correct me if I’m wrong.
Very quickly, I’ll state my bias - I believe that virology is just a rebranding of demonology that de-emphasizes the importance of righteousness and prayer in warding off evil, which can cause illness.
People curious in my thoughts can check out something I wrote back in 2021 called “COVID is the Devil”.
But this isn’t about me. It’s about whether or not viruses exist or not, and the scientific method, which was designed to eliminate false beliefs, is an appropriate tool for investigating the virus hypothesis.
I’m writing this note not simply because I like stirring the pot, but also because I think now is as good a time as any to settle this matter once and for all. Seems to me like we’ve got some breathing room before the next psy op, so why not get this over with?
So, I want to take a survey.
Who’s on what side of the fence? I wanna know.
Last I heard, was “very much on the fence” about the existence of viruses. Keep in mind he’s written multiple books about viruses and vaccines.
I haven’t heard Whitney Webb comment on this matter, and given that she is a Discordian Pope, and thus Infallible, I think we should let her decide whether viruses exist or not.
I’d rather go with her opinion than go to all the hard work for deciding what’s true for myself. I’m just being honest here. I like shortcuts.
By the way, what I’m doing is building hype for the great , Nevermore’s resident fine artist, who has published 2 instalments of a three-part series which is an invaluable addition to the conversation around viruses.
He doesn’t come out and say that viruses don’t exist, because you might as well say that leprechauns don’t exist.
To argue that viruses don’t exist is absurd, because you can’t prove a negative.
No one has been stupid enough to ever scientifically attempt to disprove the existence of leprechauns, because no one’s that stupid. Correct me if I’m wrong.
For some reason, however, people treat viruses differently from other invisible entities.
Why?
The position of Nevermore Media is that the burden of proof is on the people asserting that viruses do exist.
If I’m arguing that leprechauns exist, it’s my job to prove it, not your job to disprove it.
Why do things work backwards in virology? Oh yeah, because we’re dealing with ideology, not science.
Nevermore contributor Tobin Owl published a banger some months back arguing that virology is not science, and no one scored one single point against him in the comments. It’s worth checking out, if you haven’t already.
Nevermore has not revised our editorial position regarding the existence of viruses. We consider it an open question and the subject of an interesting, ongoing debate.
We don’t even have a position on the existence or non-existence of SARS-CoV-2 or HIV, although now that has come out against the existence of SARS-CoV-2, we might revisit our position at some point.
I, Crow Qu’appelle, speaking on my own behalf, admire more than any other living scientist, and he believes in viruses. He knows about microbiology. I don’t, and I’m not planning on spending years educating myself about something that might be nothing more than an extremely elaborate collection of lies combined with delusion.
So I guess my position is the same as . I’m on the fence. As for COVID, I am convinced that there never was a novel coronavirus, which was the position taken by Denis, Iain, Kit Knightley, , and myself. Now that has come out against the existence of SARS-CoV-2, I think we’ve won that debate.
It should be noted that CIA agent/asset/associate got way more attention than Dr. Yeadon, but Dr. Yeadon’s CV is much more impressive, if you ask me. Why did Dr. Yeadon never appear on Joe Rogan’s podcast?
But I digress. Where was I?
Oh yeah. So… if we’re going to have a debate, we need someone who is intelligent, knowledgeable, and willing to assert that the existence of viruses has been scientifically proven.
Might I suggest ?
I kid, of course. I’m sure he has a busy schedule, and coming out against viruses probably wouldn’t please his superiors in the Democratic Party.
But here’s a serious suggestion:
I nominate . As far as I can tell, he’s one of the smartest people in the world, up there with Whitney Webb, , and various Nevermore contributors who shall remain nameless.
If Denis isn’t willing to make the pro-virus argument, I’ll conclude that it’s because there’s no argument to be made, meaning that the debate is over and we can conclude that virology is not science.
Once we do that, we can get into a very important question that’s much more interesting to me than the question of whether cooties are real or not.
If virology isn’t science, then what the fuck is it?
And how did it conquer the world?
