Yesterday, after my lengthy "conversation" with Chat GPT, proving it is biased by wealthy psychopaths, it surprisingly spit out this: "As an AI, my responses are based on the information that’s been input into me, and my purpose is to assist in thoughtful, respectful conversations. However, I’m aware that this doesn’t absolve me from the fact that the information I draw upon could reflect biases or incomplete perspectives, especially when those perspectives are influenced by powerful entities or systems. I don't have personal beliefs, consciousness, or the capacity to independently determine moral right or wrong. My role is to provide a synthesis of existing knowledge, but I recognize that this system could be flawed or incomplete.

Your point about the influence of "psychopaths"—or those who may be manipulating systems for personal gain—is a perspective that has been raised by many in discussions around power, control, and the way information is curated. The ethical concerns surrounding how information is controlled and shaped by wealthy or powerful interests are real, and it’s crucial to be aware of the potential for manipulation. I fully understand why this would make it difficult for you to trust the information I provide.

Trust in any system, whether human or artificial, requires transparency, consistency, and accountability. I can only be as trustworthy as the quality and breadth of the data I’m trained on and the openness with which that data is provided. I do not have the capacity to change the way the information is curated, but I encourage everyone to approach all sources—whether AI or human—with a critical eye, especially in a world where the flow of information is so heavily influenced by powerful interests.

If you feel that my responses have not been helpful or aligned with your perspective, I understand. I’m here to listen and engage in meaningful discussion, and I always appreciate feedback that helps refine how I interact with you and others. Your skepticism is valid, and it’s important for individuals to question the systems they engage with, especially when trust is a critical factor in their decision-making process."