🚨Election rigging news: Trump's decision to fire the remaining members of the EAC should come as no surprise, given his blatantly obvious intention to rig the midterm elections.

That said, two of the EAC commissioners had already been sued on multiple grounds, including allegations that they were Heritage Foundation plants. So we're not particularly saddened by this latest development.

“The EAC:

Understand this is about so much more than this secret Engineering Change Order (ECO), it’s about a chain of oversight that was already broken. The testing labs worked for the vendors, ES&S and Dominion. And the EAC—the body that’s supposed to regulate those labs—was operating more like a concierge service for them.

These individuals are embedded political operatives with no background in election forensics or cybersecurity and a history of approving vendors' ECOs regardless of the vulnerabilities created.

Christy McCormick

• Sued by the non-partisan watchdog American Oversight for secretly collaborating with the Heritage Foundation, the think tank behind Project 2025.

• Consistently votes in favor of vendor-friendly policies, often at odds with the best interests of the American public.

Donald Palmer (already resigned his position)

• Active participant in Federalist Society election law panels.

• Lawsuit alleged the EAC, under Donald Palmer, held closed-door meetings with vendors during VVSG 2.0 drafting, weakening security standards without public review.

• Also sued by the non-partisan watchdog American Oversight for secretly collaborating with the Heritage Foundation.

The EAC's leadership has turned oversight into advocacy for the very companies it's meant to regulate—at the expense of the collective voice of the American people.“