Since publishing this piece last week (see below), Fulcrum has today announced that it has signed the contract for the Ontario Pilot Plant with Test Design Implement Solutions (TDI), supported by Extrakt and Bechtel. This is a significant de-risking event that does not alter the valuation maths, but does materially improve the probability of getting there.
Here is why:
The ‘Asset-Lite’ Thesis Validated: Recall the blue-sky question I posed about a scalable, asset-lite business model? This RNS confirms Fulcrum is executing exactly on that premise. Under the contract, TDI retains ownership of the equipment. Fulcrum is essentially leasing the pilot plant and paying for operational expertise, preserving shareholder capital and avoiding heavy infrastructure spend. So no hefty capex.
Timeline De-Risked: The original timeline called for pilot construction in H2 2026. With TDI contracted, the site selected, and a 2.4 tonnes-per-day capacity locked in, the timeline to first commercial production in 2028 remains firmly on track. The 12-batch programme over four weeks will generate the engineering data needed for the commercial build.
The Optionality Expands: Crucially, the RNS notes the pilot plant is a scalable platform designed to evaluate third-party mine waste. Fulcrum isn't just building a plant for Teck-Hughes; they are building a blueprint to roll out across the 70+ legacy sites in the Timmins and Kirkland Lake districts. This shows that the parties are setting up for a large scale rollout (far beyond Fulcrum’s initial resource) for the Extrakt technology.
Bottom line for the DCF (upside): The numbers don't change—the £6m Yorkville funding was already modelling this pilot phase. However, by securing a capital-light, contractor-operated model, Fulcrum has removed execution risk from the pilot stage. The 4.5x upside and 3.8:1 asymmetry remain the base case, but the probability of bridging the 78% NAV discount just got a lot higher. The runway is clearing for takeoff.