Sayer Ji, you are awesome! You are right on. Thank God, for those who might not be aware, FDA's VRBPAC yesterday had a drawing of outside participants (10-12 it seemed like) to be allowed to speak for 4 minutes each. Many key outspoken informed critics of mRNA Covid shots were given an opportunity to speak. Notably, Naomi Wolf was not present, who holds the best data. Karen Kingston, Interest of Justice, and the engineer at CHD and others were able to speak, referring to Dr. McCullough's conclusions of the data and VAERS data and first-hand observations. Interest of Justice put VRBPAC on notice that the only reason the COVID mRNA shots were approved was by an early act of fraud, meanng that every approval after that could not be valid with that as its foundational beginning. VRBPAC's leaders kept emphasizing that only arguments of scientific evidence could be considered in determinng the content of next year's COVID shots, as if only the continued use of COVID mRNA shots would be the plan.