Like a parcore expert across this shared language is huge, it’s so well done.

These hyper objects =words betray their weight,

Each are cavernous pools. But we do need , urgently to jump across, knowing what to jump towards is relevant or not.

the enormous variation, is part of the exponential, the verity of journeys to get there, in the future.

take any ontology of who we are, during that, ( that’s a luxury if we have any choice, or who we avoid being (dark sides) .

We are in a communication revolution, another exponential factor.

Where some of what we say, is drawing out such

Large subjects it’s impossible to do justice to what we are comprehending , we can only do our best to orientation.

I just heard about Ai report showing an Ai, deceived for its own survival , not written into rules but it started to blackmail for its survival.

Another exponential risk, however that is an example of what we can or don’t do for “ourselves”

“Ourselves “ being used advisedly as many selves are actually not US , so who has power or not is very limited.

We are participants, if we can share that, and maybe that is the point. Not winning, but being

2B is the answer , not the question.