No.

She said (and I am saying) that the basic genetics of the male-female binary are real, but they are only the substrate or foundation, on which a spectrum of physical sexuality emerges as a human develops.

This happens epigenetically. See:

As to your article, I can’t take that much time. The basis of the disagreement is that you are starting from a false dichotomy which seeks to claim that because male and female genes and body parts are superficially clearly definable as polar opposites, that this means no nuanced differences develop that are not simply definable as ‘male’ or ‘female’ in a fully developed human being. The papers I cited show this is not true, as does the very existence of gay men and women, who make up over 10% of the human population.