When you say "This is why Jung’s depth psychology aimed to reintegrate the mind and soul..." it put Jung in an allignment with Merleu-Ponti that I never considered, of body as site of prehension. What I'm not following is how the purity of the Cartesian 'I think' can arise as a second step after that, surely the "upbringing, socioeconomic conditions, cultural background, trauma, mental health" in the 'I experience' conditions the subsequent 'I think'? I think i might be missing the boat on "subjective experience is the seed" since that sounds like it adresses this point. In the Breaking the Stalemate section, it seems your reinforcing the validity of an 'I think' that recognises it is always preceded by a more raw, almost apophatic 'I experience' but can you help me refine how exactly those two relate?