Just a note, on the submission page this statement is written about LK-99: "The entire cycle, from headline-grabbing discovery to thorough debunking, unfolded in about three weeks. Under the journal system, that process would likely have taken years.".

But there was a peer reviewed failure to replicate LK-99 published in October 2023, 3 months after the initial announcement. So this statement is wrong, even if the broader point that systems of traditional peer review often take more time is correct.

pubs.acs.org/doi/10.102…

This was published in a non-profit journal run by the American Chemical Society.