The app for independent voices
None of those things represent polarization or a lack of social cohesion. Two entirely different points here.
For example, Milei could be considered a polarizing and divisive figure, but according to Arctotherium, the juice is worth the squeeze.
Indians simply support safetyism, which is the opposite of polarization. They actually come bearing gifts of social cohesion. The real problem, then, is this obsession with social cohesion as an end unto itself.
White nationalists like to conflate social cohesion with ethnocentrism, but they are not the same thing.
This post claims otherwise, perhaps you should write a rebuttal: arctotherium.substack.c…
"If you think the United States needs less freedom-of-speech, more state regulation of the economy, more affirmative action, and more wealth redistribution, supporting Indian immigration is sensible... Quite apart from their ideological beliefs, Indi…