The deployment of AI with large error rates is less tech news than evidence of specific corrupt governments (which are problematic even without the tech). Regarding the discretion that legislation assumes, AI used to classify cases that would be upheld in appellate court if prosecuted (rather than classify cases of broken law). So I don’t see tech as problematic for handling crime. In fact, I think corruption cannot be solved without unseating some people who hold power, but not everyone who holds power deserves to have it taken away, so ending corruption may require automated surveillance of the most powerful.