The app for independent voices

The "war on chlorine dioxide" is part of the silent war on "cure."

What happens when chlorine dioxide cures a case of illness or disease? Nothing. Outside of clinical studies, each of which might articulate their specific definition of cured, cured is only medically defined for an approved drug or surgery that addresses the cause of an infectious disease.

Cured is not medically defined for any non-infectious disease. There is no medically recognized test of cured for any non-infectious disrase. Cured is not medically defined for any chronic disease. Chronic diseases have no approved medical tests for cured. Cured is not medically defined for any infectious disease that is cured without an approved medicine. There is no accepted test of cured, much less of "cured by" for the common cold. Influenza, measles, or COVID. Cured is also not medically defined for any infectious disease cured by a non,-approced treatment - like chlorine dioxide.

When any illness or disease is cured with or by the administration of chlorine dioxide, or DMSO, or Vitamin C, Vitamin D, or even grandmas chicken soup. All claims of cured are simply ignored. There is no proof because, by the absence of a definition of cured, cured cannot be proven - so "cured by" cannot be proven either. Even when the Nobel Prize in Medicine was awarded for Ivermectin, the word "cure" never appeared. It's not about Chlorine Dioxide. Chlorine dioxide is simply another example of the standard protocol.

Cured is undefined. No one is interested in defining cured. So no cureds are possible, so no cures are possible, not even for what appears to be one of the best possible curatives, chlorine dioxide.

To your health, Tracy

Author: A New Theory of Cure

"The War on Chlorine Dioxide" Is Now Published: Why a Simple Compound Became Too Dangerous to Discuss
Mar 5
at
10:55 PM
Relevant people

Log in or sign up

Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.