Excellent read!! Much appreciated.

I am not an Epic hater per se but I do dislike their need for creativity. For example, using names like Phoenix for transplant and Beacon for oncology, amongst many terminology flaws, only adds to cognitive load and provides no value. It also strongly hints to the possibility they do not employ design experts - or they are single domain and don’t communicate effectively with clinicians.

I had hopes that Oracle would soar, as a ~50-year-old database company, especially as we continually immerse ourselves in AI. I’ve done a lot of work with Epic, Meditech, and former Cerner. Anyone seeing novel approaches to AI in Oracle?