I was banned from RZ's Discord for calling it a coalpost, and I stand by that. What I found fascinating was Zoomer's exegesis regarding the death of people entering the Lord's Supper unworthily as merely temporal punishment. Quoting RZ in his response video,

"In Leviticus, Nadab and Abihu offered strange fire before the Lord. They were struck dead for that. Does that mean they were unsaved? No. Does that mean they didn't have true faith? No...It's a perfectly reasonable interpretation of this passage that they were true believers that just took the Eucharist in a blasphemous manner...it's perfectly reasonable to read this passage as true believers are taking the sacrament in an unworthy, irreverent manner and being punished by God for doing that. But this is a temporal punishment."

For Nadab and Abihu to be consumed by the fires of God framed merely as temporal punishment is baseless and unsupported by the Fathers. It is contrary to the warning provided by St. Paul one chapter before in 1 Corinthians 10. St. Paul warns the Corinthians by recalling the Exodus, where the Israelites partook in the supernatural food and supernatural drink, typologically preceding the Eucharist. As St. Paul warns, "You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons." 1 Cor. 10:21. And yet, to eat the Lord's Supper unworthily, to die because of it is merely temporal following the example of Nadab and Abihu?

Taking Zoomer's logic to its extreme leads to an absurd conclusion. If someone truly believes in Christ, is eternally secure as one of the elect, and yet approaches the Eucharist blasphemously, then being struck dead by God for that act simply becomes a shortcut to heaven. That simply does not follow from St. Paul's warnings.

TL;DR, Coalpost by RZ, Zoomer's 1 Corinthians argument is absurd; complete gem article