I’m struck by how your point about the gap between error identification and error correction is actually an opportunity for activating intellectual curiosity. That’s where the authentic search for new knowledge begins. It’s the same reason why I emphasize the importance of asking, “What’s left out?” of the media messages we read, view, listen to, or engage with. To spot an omission requires active knowledge-building. In the process, we can more easily recognize the different points of view that authors embed in every choice they make to construct a media message.