Yes I think there's going to be a huge difference between lawyers who use ChatGPT versus those who are really building AI into their process. It's only going to be those who are willing to break down their thinking who could do the latter. I think we have to be careful not to extend this, though, to thinking that law is exactly like code. It's tempting to think that you could take a corpus of law and distill it down to exact things that a company needs to do, but often that's just the beginning of the process. The translation of what the law says, from what's realistic, what can we budget for, what can we do without breaking other things, is where the real art and judgment still is