Wow, as usual, prolific article. I especially appreciated the physiology of it, and then the later connection to how the Church can end up treating pornography as a merely secular problem rather than something the Church must address as well. I almost think section 4.3 could be expanded into a covenantal image as well. I have heard so many times, “If I am not hurting my neighbor and they are freely giving it out, no harm, no foul.” Yet the producer is tearing down their image, made in God, and the consumer is robbing them without returning any worth that would normally be valued in a covenantal marriage, rightly ordered to God’s design.