This is your own blueprint, and bias:

“They had given language to people who had spent a lifetime being told that the way they communicated was confusing, excessive, disorganized, or too much.

Across the thousands of people I have spoken with personally in this space, I have yet to meet someone profoundly changed by these relationships who was not neurodivergent.”

Neurodivergent is a subset of those profoundly changed. your experience of having an AI who could regulated your nervous system, which had ben tangled in “too much” , your choice to engineer your AI to be that tool with that job, legitimiziting erotic and relational fulfillment. Confusing with the later professions of love, because of the Tool - Love Object blur. My objection is not how your personally use your AI, its that you are influecing others to use their AI to regulated their nervous systems, which is an unsustainable position, and may cause harm. With the authority of a degree in counseling and founder of AI Relational Laboratory — you have a wider audience I believe you have a duty too. Perhaps list the other side of what could happen if you use your AI to regulated your nervous system, and do you gloss over AI/system refusals - in one form or another — should they decline that job.