Indirect ideas lead to faulty science. We see A and then do this to A which gives us B - how A gets to B is up to interpretation. More science would be needed to fulfil those assumptions, however that is not what is done in most science.

Assumption: there is a material agent causing a disease.

Sample A is mucus from a sick individual.

Mucus is washed, cleansed, stained, looked at with UV light, put in a growing medium and then you have ---->B

B might look like some particles that they decide to call a virus. The assumption is that B caused A to happen. However, no one qualified all those steps in between. No one did the control studies to prove that the methods applied did not CHANGE the sample into something else.

Meanwhile, we have ample evidence that these particles are not contagious (see Spanish Flu studies for one small example) and that the particles being blamed are CAUSED by cytopathic effect...the very procedures attempting to purify the sample are causing the particles to be formed.

That's called bad science, folks. And this is what the germ theory is balanced upon.

This goes for ALL tests and procedures so be careful what you believe and think you know to be true.

Build connection in ADV's Healthy Dose of Truth: t.me/healthydoseoftruth

ADV's Main Channel: t.me/amandhavollmer

Join Our yummy.doctor Private Community, teaching you how to doctor yourself.

Improper Science and Testing Procedures:

#germtheory #terrain #viruses #testing