Thanks for your response!

The hypothesis becomes unfalsifiable when we disregard the first postulate. If it is possible for the large or even vast majority of positive pcr tests to be associated with healthy people, not sick people, and that evidence and outcome is dismissed as ‘asymptomatic infection’…this means we have a theory that, whatever the outcome of the testing, the virus sequence is a pathogen…even if 98% of people who test positive for ‘sarscov2’ have no symptoms.

This means, however an experiment turns out, whatever the results, there is no way to disprove the hypothesis that ‘sarscov2’ causes ‘covid’

Perhaps we can focus on ‘covid’ before moving on to general blood infection in hospitals. The question here is, do you acknowledge that, in this very large mass testing event in China in 2022, the results showed that over 98% of those who were pcr+ for sarscov2 had no symptoms. Less than 2% of pcr+ actually had symptoms.

Other evidence shows 80% of pcr+ have no symptoms…and the only true mass testing event of millions of people is this one I am showing you where only 2% of people w sarscov2 were actually sick, as in with symptoms. Do you see this evidence? And, if this does not disprove the virus hypothesis for sarscov2 and covid, then whaT would disprove that hypothesis?