While acknowledging your perspective on free speech and your personal approach to handling online harassment, it is vital to consider that individuals' resilience and ability to ignore hateful or harmful comments may vary significantly. Factors such as personal experiences, background, and exposure to harassment play a role in shaping one's coping mechanisms. Your half-Jewish ancestry does not do much, seeing as chances are you have passed as a white Christian woman your whole life. Online moderation, therefore, serves to protect those who may be more vulnerable to harassment or the negative effects of certain types of speech.

Striking a balance between free speech and maintaining a safe, inclusive online environment is essential. Online moderation need not equate to stifling free speech and free thought. Instead, it can function as a tool to ensure that public discourse remains civil, respectful, and diverse.

Moreover, cultivating internal strength is undoubtedly valuable but may not suffice to counteract the negative impacts of widespread harassment or hate speech online. A collective effort to encourage respectful discourse, paired with moderation systems prioritizing safety and inclusivity, can foster a more hospitable online space for all.

It is also crucial to recognize that some forms of speech, such as hate speech or incitement to violence, can have severe real-world consequences. In such cases, moderation can serve as a necessary measure to prevent harm and ensure public safety.

In conclusion, while your personal approach to handling online harassment is commendable, it is essential to contemplate the broader ramifications of unrestricted speech and the potential necessity for moderation in fostering a safe and inclusive online environment for everyone.