All I’m seeing from this article is some very motivated reasoning from the author.
I’m no expert on any of this but Starmer seems to have been in a position to do something about this horrific scandal for years and did not until much later. Given that there have been thousands of victims over many decades, the 5 prosecutions he pursued don’t really add up to justice, in my view.
The ‘evidence’ you cite to prove Phillips’ innocence is just her statement on why she made that decision. That’s awfull…
Your use of the past tense is not correct. The scandal is ongoing. And you are clearly downplaying it. You seem far more upset about a politician getting too much blame than you are about children being raped and nothing being done about it. Julie Bindel tells the story you should be focusing on, from an entirely leftist POV: thecritic.co.uk/i-did-m…
And do you honestly really not understand that THIS is why Trump won? Elites (and yes you are an elite, and so am I) protecting elites as the first…