And this is that "gone too far" thing I was speaking to earlier.

How I see it...

The absolute "critical" Vaccines with a spread out, logical schedule should be a Column 1 Vaccine (the name doesn't matter, so call it what you will). These should only include the really necessary vaccinations that protect against death and severe side effects. This should be produced on American soil, in an American Lab, and tested per batch. These should be essentially a break even offering as offer a public benefit. Each one should be separate, each ingredient and the percentage of each clearly labeled. We should put in place tests to assure that each "individual" is in a safe zone to receive these (allergy test, etc.). And because we are a free people, we should be provided all the pros and cons in a simple manner so we can decide for ourselves to take these. (Real herd immunity exists so the percentage of people who are safe and decide to go ahead with these should cover the low percentage of people who can't or don't). This should be a not for profit company who is third party tested. End of story.

2nd Column vaccines are those that have been around for more than 15 years, rigorously tested, and can be offered by for profit vaccine companies. All ingredients listed, pros and cons listed, should protect whoever receives them for at least 5 years (maybe more), and should have a schedule that places them far enough apart from the column 1 vaccines so as to allow the body to rest properly between. None of these should be required to take for anything other than governmental work - military being one example. These should be covered by liability laws.

Column 3 should be what doesn't meet the above criteria, flu vaccines as one example. All data should be available to make an informed decision. These should be approved for use and then active for 7 years with minor modifications (once again, think flu vaccines needing to change the dominant strain proteins covered for their predictions). Same liability, same ingredient list. (Liability means they will self impose 3rd party sampling to cover their arses and to market this as actually safe to the public). These are only required on a case by case basis for strict reasons... Like during war on foreign lands and actively being deployed to whatever region kind of thing.

Column 4 Vaccines - experimental or new to market... mRNA tech would fall into this category, sort of... These have passed all testing phases, 3rd party reviews by independent labs, etc. No one will ever be forced to take these, ever. If they work well and we are in the middle of a true pandemic, people will line up to take them because they don't want to die. Everything else said on Column 3 stands. If they are the subpart Experimental, the batches and ingredients can change by a certain range of percentage more, but a general ingredient list should be offered so at least who ever is lining up to take them knows what each ingredient is and an approximation of how much for each. This should be a big deal to take these and all involved should be provided all the data up to that point, the side effects, everything to be able to make an informed decision.

Marketing for any vaccine should be limited to true pandemics ONLY, and if during such an event, the public should be made aware of this without "selling" the product, rather, just being informed of their existence and where it can be found. No amount of someone else's safety should ever enter any conversation unless brought up between the patient and their doctor. No records for any of these, short of maybe column 1, should be shared with anyone other than if applying for certain government type service corps - army, navy, etc. Maybe certain travel regions of the world too, and we could design a system that protects people's freedoms and safety - like a fly to Africa in a known hotspot for ebola... May warrant a quarantine cruise ship back home rather than a 16 hour flight through three countries. Whatever, you get my point.

We can protect safety and freedom logically, hold accountability where necessary, allow profits to be made by free market decision making all while approaching this logically, morally, and ethically.

I'm open to suggestions, but this should offer a decent framework for how it quote possibly should be. That's my $2 worth again, I no longer accept crypto for payment, silver is preferred but I'll still take the PetroDollar too. 😉😁

You are all awesome peeps (generally). Great, thought provoking article, always glad "a cat don't got your tongue" boriquagato ...lol.

🤜💥🤛