Hi Michael - Thank you for the feedback.
My substack is related mainly to the work of the most censored scientist and 9/11 researcher, Dr Judy Wood.
She filed a RFC (request for correction) against NST in 2007, (along with another professor, Morgan Reynolds who also filed his own RFC to NIST with regards to their plane impact studies), which allowed her to file a suit against 23 NIST subcontractors for SCIENCE FRAUD in the same year (Morgan also sued the 23 NIST subcontractors).
Architects for an engineered truth’s website wasn’t even active when she filed her whistle blower case.
Dr Wood then also went ahead and files a US Supreme Court case in 2009, which the judge in the case, did not want to hear, but in his summation he stated “I am not following the law by NOT hearing the case” – So don’t let anyone tell you it was “dismissed” on merit, as it was not.
Read the court filings here: drjudywood.com/wp/court…
What is perplexing is that the WHOLE truth movement keeps mum about these cases and the evidence presented.
In 2023 I asked Richard Gage, founder of architects for an engineered truth, about these cases and he LIED knowing about them: rumble.com/v3g82mu-911-…
I also asked Ted Walter, CEO of the “International Center for 9/11 Justice” why he and his organisation ALSO deny any knowledge of the evidence contained in these 3 cases, he also seemed rather disingenuous in his answer, watch the interaction - rumble.com/v3mmu61-the-…
So, the question arises, WHY do they DENY a conclusive body of evidence presented in these cases?
More on Dr Wood here:
In the search for 9/11 Accountability
