The app for independent voices

“Elsewhere, a LinkedIn profile calls him a ‘former CIA paramilitary operations officer’” - David A. Graham, The Atlantic

Funnily enough, for all the obsession with my LinkedIn profile… that’s actually not on my LinkedIn profile. Go ahead: check. If they can’t even get that minor detail right… well, then they aren’t as good at this as they think they are. 

Secondly, there’s nothing I could provide that would convince such individuals of my background, hence why I haven’t made such materials available - I also have a duty to protect the Agency, as I suspect certain bad actors know and are taking advantage of. Those who matter have verified my service; those who don’t obviously lack the capability to do so. 

It also amazes me that of three whistleblowers to come forward regarding the NSA-authorized audit, I’m treated as if I’m the only one (also, I didn’t say the NSA conducted the audit, but rather authorized it). 

This has all been addressed previously. They have nothing new to offer. 

In short, keep coming at me with these one-sided hit pieces - I’m not going anywhere, and these pieces are all hilariously telling. Meanwhile, you’re still not talking about the human trafficking, organized crime, and child exploitation, which is also quite telling and which is absolutely fundamental to understand as to WHY the elections were rigged in the first place. 

That’s right: I provided motive. Others have already provided means and methods. 

Articles such as Graham’s are a cowardly red herring—a last ditch distraction, all to keep people from examining the evidence that’s available right before their eyes: should they choose to look. 

Yes, I’m mocking you—it’s not my fault that you’re too ignorant to pick up on the joke. 

In other news, I would also like to thank the government of Italy for dispatching the Fasan to the Sumud flotilla…

#ChessNotCheckers 

See my prior response:

awarning.substack.com/p…

My LinkedIn profile, for, you know, fact-checking like journalists should before publishing: linkedin.com/in/adam-m-…

The book (free): awarning.substack.com/p…

Yes, we’re aware of The Atlantic’s recent piece.

Several whistleblowers have come forward—two of whom provided receipts—yet The Atlantic chose to omit that entirely. Ignoring Trump and Musk’s repeated public statements about stealing the election isn’t just poor reporting; it raises serious questions about journalistic integrity.

Even more…

Sep 25
at
4:37 PM
Relevant people

Log in or sign up

Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.