Thanks for bringing up this other blog of yours, subscribed! I intend to respond, but the very first point is profoundly disappointing.

> "unprovoked capture of Maduro in Venezuela and the war in Iran, it seems the modern USA is a war machine (what critics refer to as the “military industrial complex”) that has deeply internalized — rather, resigned themselves to — this philosophy of “kill or be killed”"

Terrible, absolutely terrible. You're being a deranged leftie who's seeing the most cucked and merciful empire in the history of man, as cucked as the laws of physics allow (and long since overstepping them, hence the imminent collapse), and yet you're calling it... murderous? Where have you seen murder? Aren't you aware of the simple math that under the US occupation, the population of Iraq rose by 10 million, and Afghanistan - by 20 million? The Philippines, Japan - the countries America actively occupied! - all rose and prospered. This is self-hate of astronomical proportions, equal to French and Russian!

> "And the Mexican cartels are just one of many factors that reinforce US foreign policy."

Umm, I'm sorry, what? I thought US foreign policy would be reinforced by Mexico City being settled by blond, blue-eyed angels, not swarthy orcs.

> "the complicated historical mess that led to the brutal war that Jesus of Nazareth had also predicted long ahead of time"

First of all, Jesus is a literary character, not a person. Second, the writer of the Gospels couldn't predict the fall of the temple, instead he was writing after the war.

> "the theocracy of that day would be judged for the crimes and insincerity of all previous hypocritical religious leaders who had come before"

But there were no religions prior to Christianity. And bizarre to blame it all on hypocrisy.

> "the Sicarii would also come to the point of accepting that very bad things would need to happen in order to make things right. In absolute defiance of the advice of the man from Nazareth, these zealouts refused to look within and figure out where they had strayed spiritually. No, these zealots were hell-bent on going for the jugular."

And they succeeded massively. Are you gonna deny the concept of creative destruction, even though it works splendidly every time?

> "exchange with the Pharisees over the question of taxation — particularly paying taxes to a blasphemous Caesar. Jesus’ response was not a treatise on taxation, but rather a message to not worry about “the Beast” that Rome would eventually become"

But... Jesus was not talking to Jews? Christianity is designed as a cultural weapon by Jews against Aryans?

> "From the perspective of the words of Jesus, this was the ultimate “I told you so”. The corrupt theocracy had deluded themselves into thinking such could never come to pass."

What???? I'm at a loss. How are the terrorist freedom-fighters "corrupt"? Their whole point was to destroy corruption, and so they did, successfully.

> "This recent admission from the Israeli Prime Minister is a modern manifestation of the very same mindset of the zealout Jews who had originally provoked their own destruction (by provoking war with Rome) in 70AD"

Umm, hello? What destruction? Are you... are you denying reality to such an extent that you're missing the whole point? That the Jews are alive and well, and that the Sicarii won? Ironically, in the space of the divine gods, of culture war - both to inspire their own people by their blood shed, and by humiliating the Romans by instilling the Jesus cult in Aryan lands, so the picture is a tad more complex, but they still won! Just as how the Aryan race might stand a chance now in Poland and Belarus thanks to Hitler who exterminated all the Jews living there.