Yes, one of our goals in writing AI as Normal Technology was to provide an explicit positive vision that a broad swath of society can potentially rally around — one that contrasts with the weird utopias that AI leaders tend to promote. AINT is not a prediction; it won’t happen by default. It will take a lot of work to shape AI so that we derive transformative benefits while keeping it as a tool. But it is achievable if we collectively want it. The point is that we can accept the technology without accepting the vision of the future that comes from its developers.
I agree! And the more nuanced folks in the DC accelerationist camp who I talked to felt this way too. They want AI to be a “normal technology” in the Sayash Kapoor / Arvind Narayanan sense — it’s a tool, it’ll make life easier, but it fades into the background — just like washing machines and high-speed rail. I’m very sympathetic to this vision. Unfortunately a lot …
Feb 13
at
3:08 PM
Relevant people
Log in or sign up
Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.